Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT75 vs Caterpillar 426B
CaterpillarModel B
Caterpillar 426B
Specialized
- power
- 79 hp
- displacement
- 243 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
AGCOAGCO GT75
vs
CaterpillarCaterpillar 426B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ GT75 higher · +4 hp (+5%)GT7583 hp
426B79 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT75 is in the 73rd percentile; 426B is in the 70th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT75 higher · +1 ci (<1%)GT75244 ci
426B243 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT75 is in the 68th percentile; 426B is in the 67th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT754
426B4
Median Utility Tractor4
GT75 is in the 50th percentile; 426B is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ GT75 higher · +12 (+300%)GT7516
426B4
Median Utility Tractor12
GT75 is in the 73rd percentile; 426B is in the 4th · 4,941 models
GT75 (A)426B (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Caterpillar 426B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | GT75 | 426B | — |
| Category | Utility | Specialized, Backhoe Loader | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Caterpillar 426B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3054 | — |
| Power Output | 83hp | 79hp | ▲ GT75+4 hp · +5% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 243ci | ▲ GT75+1 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.9in | ▲ GT75+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 5in | ▲ 426B+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Caterpillar 426B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Power shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Caterpillar 426B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 274in | ▲ 426B+122 in · +80% |
| Width | 76.4in | 89in | ▲ 426B+12.6 in · +16% |
| Height | 106in | 107in | ▲ 426B+1 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 5,511lb | 14,771lb | ▲ 426B+9,260 lb · +168% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Caterpillar 426B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Closed center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Caterpillar 426B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent with electro-hydraulic clutch | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Caterpillar 426B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,530lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Caterpillar 426B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Wet disc | Wet disc | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Caterpillar 426B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Caterpillar 426B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 5.6gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Caterpillar 426B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post folding ROPS | ROPS canopy or cab (optional) | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 73rd percentile (83 hp)B · 70th percentile (79 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 67th percentile (243 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 4th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 51st percentile (5,511 lb)B · 93rd percentile (14,771 lb)
A · GT75B · 426BMedian Utility Tractor