Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT75 vs John Deere 310J
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere 310J
Specialized
- power
- 84 hp
- displacement
- 275 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
AGCOAGCO GT75
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 310J
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 310J higher · +1 hp (+1%)GT7583 hp
310J84 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT75 is in the 73rd percentile; 310J is in the 74th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 310J higher · +31 ci (+13%)GT75244 ci
310J275 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT75 is in the 68th percentile; 310J is in the 80th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT754
310J4
Median Utility Tractor4
GT75 is in the 50th percentile; 310J is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ GT75 higher · +12 (+300%)GT7516
310J4
Median Utility Tractor12
GT75 is in the 73rd percentile; 310J is in the 4th · 4,941 models
GT75 (A)310J (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | John Deere 310J | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | John Deere | — |
| Model | GT75 | 310J | — |
| Category | Utility | Specialized, Backhoe Loader | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | John Deere 310J | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | John Deere | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 4045 | — |
| Power Output | 83hp | 84hp | ▲ 310J+1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ GT75+200 RPM · +10% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 275ci | ▲ 310J+31 ci · +13% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.2in | ▲ 310J+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 5in | ▲ 310J+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | John Deere 310J | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Full powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | John Deere 310J | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 279in | ▲ 310J+127 in · +84% |
| Width | 76.4in | 85.8in | ▲ 310J+9.4 in · +12% |
| Height | 106in | 108in | ▲ 310J+2 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 5,511lb | 13,880lb | ▲ 310J+8,369 lb · +152% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | John Deere 310J | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | John Deere 310J | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent with electro-hydraulic clutch | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | John Deere 310J | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,530lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | John Deere 310J | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Wet disc | Hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | John Deere 310J | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | John Deere 310J | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 6.5gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | John Deere 310J | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post folding ROPS | ROPS or Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 73rd percentile (83 hp)B · 74th percentile (84 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 80th percentile (275 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 4th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 51st percentile (5,511 lb)B · 92nd percentile (13,880 lb)
A · GT75B · 310JMedian Utility Tractor