Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT75 vs McCormick Intl X50.20
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X50.20
Utility
- power
- 85 hp
- displacement
- 208 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
AGCOAGCO GT75
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X50.20
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ X50.20 higher · +2 hp (+2%)GT7583 hp
X50.2085 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT75 is in the 73rd percentile; X50.20 is in the 75th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GT75 higher · +36 ci (+17%)GT75244 ci
X50.20208 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT75 is in the 68th percentile; X50.20 is in the 58th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT754
X50.204
Median Utility Tractor4
GT75 is in the 50th percentile; X50.20 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ X50.20 higher · +2,519 lb (+46%)GT755,511 lb
X50.208,030 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
GT75 is in the 51st percentile; X50.20 is in the 76th · 5,107 models
GT75 (A)X50.20 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | McCormick Intl X50.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | GT75 | X50.20 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | McCormick Intl X50.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 854E-E34TA | — |
| Power Output | 83hp | 85hp | ▲ X50.20+2 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 208ci | ▲ GT75+36 ci · +17% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.9in | ▲ GT75+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.3in | ▲ GT75+0.2 in · +5% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | McCormick Intl X50.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Multiple - See Additional Notes | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | McCormick Intl X50.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 164in | ▲ X50.20+12 in · +8% |
| Width | 76.4in | 83in | ▲ X50.20+6.6 in · +9% |
| Height | 106in | 101in | ▲ GT75+5 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | 5,511lb | 8,030lb | ▲ X50.20+2,519 lb · +46% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | McCormick Intl X50.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | McCormick Intl X50.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent with electro-hydraulic clutch | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | McCormick Intl X50.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 380/70R24 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 480/70R34 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | McCormick Intl X50.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,530lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | McCormick Intl X50.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | McCormick Intl X50.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | McCormick Intl X50.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post folding ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 73rd percentile (83 hp)B · 75th percentile (85 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 58th percentile (208 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 51st percentile (5,511 lb)B · 76th percentile (8,030 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 67th percentile (152 in)B · 82nd percentile (164 in)
A · GT75B · X50.20Median Utility Tractor