Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO GT75 vs Ursus C-385
AGCOAGCO GT75
vs
UrsusUrsus C-385
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ C-385 higher · +2 hp (+2%)GT7583 hp
C-38585 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
GT75 is in the 73rd percentile; C-385 is in the 75th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ C-385 higher · +35 ci (+14%)GT75244 ci
C-385279 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
GT75 is in the 68th percentile; C-385 is in the 82nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedGT754
C-3854
Median Utility Tractor4
GT75 is in the 50th percentile; C-385 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedGT7516
C-38516
Median Utility Tractor12
GT75 is in the 73rd percentile; C-385 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
GT75 (A)C-385 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Ursus C-385 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Ursus | — |
| Model | GT75 | C-385 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Ursus C-385 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | SAME Deutz-Fahr | Ursus | — |
| Power Output | 83hp | 85hp | ▲ C-385+2 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 279ci | ▲ C-385+35 ci · +14% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.3in | ▲ C-385+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.7in | ▲ C-385+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Ursus C-385 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro-shuttle | Partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Ursus C-385 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 155in | ▲ C-385+3 in · +2% |
| Width | 76.4in | 76in | ▲ GT75+0.4 in · <1% |
| Height | 106in | 97.8in | ▲ GT75+8.2 in · +8% |
| Operating Weight | 5,511lb | 9,943lb | ▲ C-385+4,432 lb · +80% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Ursus C-385 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power assist | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Ursus C-385 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent with electro-hydraulic clutch | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Ursus C-385 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,530lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Ursus C-385 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power assist | — |
| Brake Type | Wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Ursus C-385 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO GT75 | Ursus C-385 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post folding ROPS | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 73rd percentile (83 hp)B · 75th percentile (85 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 82nd percentile (279 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 51st percentile (5,511 lb)B · 86th percentile (9,943 lb)
A · GT75B · C-385Median Utility Tractor