Head to head · Utility
AGCO LT75 vs CaseIH Farmall 75C
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 75C
Utility
- power
- 76 hp
- displacement
- 195 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
AGCOAGCO LT75
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 75C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ LT75 higher · +3 hp (+4%)LT7579 hp
Farmall 75C76 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
LT75 is in the 70th percentile; Farmall 75C is in the 69th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ LT75 higher · +79 ci (+41%)LT75274 ci
Farmall 75C195 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
LT75 is in the 79th percentile; Farmall 75C is in the 52nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedLT754
Farmall 75C4
Median Utility Tractor4
LT75 is in the 50th percentile; Farmall 75C is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedLT7516
Farmall 75C16
Median Utility Tractor12
LT75 is in the 73rd percentile; Farmall 75C is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
LT75 (A)Farmall 75C (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO LT75 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | CaseIH | — |
| Model | LT75 | Farmall 75C | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO LT75 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Fiat Powertrain Technologies (FPT) | — |
| Model | Not recorded | Turbocharged Intercooled Diesel | — |
| Power Output | 79hp | 76hp | ▲ LT75+3 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,201RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ Farmall 75C+99 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 274ci | 195ci | ▲ LT75+79 ci · +41% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.9in | ▲ LT75+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 4.1in | ▲ LT75+1.1 in · +27% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO LT75 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Selective gear fixed ratio with partial (2) range operator controlled powershift | Mechanical Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO LT75 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 166in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 110in | Not recorded | — |
| Wheelbase | 101in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 9,600lb | 5,776lb | ▲ LT75+3,824 lb · +66% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO LT75 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power steering | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO LT75 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | AGCO LT75 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 14.9R24 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 18.4R34 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO LT75 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 7,817lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO LT75 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Front wheel assist (4WD) | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power steering | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO LT75 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | 12-volt electric | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO LT75 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 70th percentile (79 hp)B · 69th percentile (76 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 79th percentile (274 ci)B · 52nd percentile (195 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 84th percentile (9,600 lb)B · 54th percentile (5,776 lb)
A · LT75B · Farmall 75CMedian Utility Tractor