Head to head · Utility
AGCO LT75A vs Challenger MT525B
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT525B
Agricultural
- power
- 104 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
AGCOAGCO LT75A
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT525B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT525B higher · +4 hp (+4%)LT75A100 hp
MT525B104 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
LT75A is in the 84th percentile; MT525B is in the 84th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT525B higher · +134 ci (+50%)LT75A268 ci
MT525B402 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
LT75A is in the 76th percentile; MT525B is in the 90th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT525B higher · +2 (+50%)LT75A4
MT525B6
Median Utility Tractor4
LT75A is in the 50th percentile; MT525B is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT525B higher · +6,380 lb (+72%)LT75A8,820 lb
MT525B15,200 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
LT75A is in the 81st percentile; MT525B is in the 93rd · 5,107 models
LT75A (A)MT525B (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO LT75A | Challenger MT525B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Challenger | — |
| Model | LT75A | MT525B | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO LT75A | Challenger MT525B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Sisu | Perkins Diesel | — |
| Model | Not recorded | U092650K | — |
| Power Output | 100hp | 104hp | ▲ MT525B+4 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ MT525B+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 268ci | 402ci | ▲ MT525B+134 ci · +50% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.1in | ▲ LT75A+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 5in | ▲ MT525B+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO LT75A | Challenger MT525B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Powershift | Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO LT75A | Challenger MT525B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 174in | 169in | ▲ LT75A+5 in · +3% |
| Width | Not recorded | 81.1in | — |
| Height | 107in | 113in | ▲ MT525B+6 in · +6% |
| Operating Weight | 8,820lb | 15,200lb | ▲ MT525B+6,380 lb · +72% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO LT75A | Challenger MT525B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensating (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | AGCO LT75A | Challenger MT525B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 14.9R24 | 14.9R28 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 18.4R34 | 18.4R38 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO LT75A | Challenger MT525B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type II | II/III | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 2/3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO LT75A | Challenger MT525B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Two-Wheel Drive | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic Wet Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO LT75A | Challenger MT525B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO LT75A | Challenger MT525B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 7.4gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO LT75A | Challenger MT525B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 84th percentile (100 hp)B · 84th percentile (104 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 76th percentile (268 ci)B · 90th percentile (402 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 81st percentile (8,820 lb)B · 93rd percentile (15,200 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 88th percentile (174 in)B · 85th percentile (169 in)
A · LT75AB · MT525BMedian Utility Tractor