
Head to head · Utility
AGCO LT75A vs Fendt Favorit 510C


FendtModel B
Fendt Favorit 510C
Utility
- power
- 105 hp
- displacement
- 254 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 44
AGCOAGCO LT75A
vs
FendtFendt Favorit 510C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Favorit 510C higher · +5 hp (+5%)LT75A100 hp
Favorit 510C105 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
LT75A is in the 84th percentile; Favorit 510C is in the 85th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ LT75A higher · +14 ci (+6%)LT75A268 ci
Favorit 510C254 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
LT75A is in the 76th percentile; Favorit 510C is in the 71st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedLT75A4
Favorit 510C4
Median Utility Tractor4
LT75A is in the 50th percentile; Favorit 510C is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Favorit 510C higher · +28 (+175%)LT75A16
Favorit 510C44
Median Utility Tractor12
LT75A is in the 73rd percentile; Favorit 510C is in the 99th · 4,941 models
LT75A (A)Favorit 510C (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO LT75A | Fendt Favorit 510C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Fendt | — |
| Model | LT75A | Favorit 510C | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO LT75A | Fendt Favorit 510C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Sisu | MWM | — |
| Power Output | 100hp | 105hp | ▲ Favorit 510C+5 hp · +5% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ Favorit 510C+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 268ci | 254ci | ▲ LT75A+14 ci · +6% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.1in | ▲ LT75A+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 4.7in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO LT75A | Fendt Favorit 510C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Powershift | Four-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO LT75A | Fendt Favorit 510C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 174in | 165in | ▲ LT75A+9 in · +5% |
| Width | Not recorded | 89.8in | — |
| Height | 107in | 110in | ▲ Favorit 510C+3 in · +3% |
| Operating Weight | 8,820lb | 10,957lb | ▲ Favorit 510C+2,137 lb · +24% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO LT75A | Fendt Favorit 510C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | AGCO LT75A | Fendt Favorit 510C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 14.9R24 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 18.4R34 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO LT75A | Fendt Favorit 510C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type II | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III/II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO LT75A | Fendt Favorit 510C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO LT75A | Fendt Favorit 510C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO LT75A | Fendt Favorit 510C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 84th percentile (100 hp)B · 85th percentile (105 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 76th percentile (268 ci)B · 71st percentile (254 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 99th percentile (44)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 81st percentile (8,820 lb)B · 88th percentile (10,957 lb)
A · LT75AB · Favorit 510CMedian Utility Tractor