
Head to head · Utility
AGCO LT85 vs CaseIH Farmall 85C


CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 85C
Utility
- power
- 84 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
AGCOAGCO LT85
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 85C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ LT85 higher · +1.4 hp (+2%)LT8585.4 hp
Farmall 85C84 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
LT85 is in the 75th percentile; Farmall 85C is in the 74th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Farmall 85C higher · +35 ci (+15%)LT85239 ci
Farmall 85C274 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
LT85 is in the 66th percentile; Farmall 85C is in the 79th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedLT854
Farmall 85C4
Median Utility Tractor4
LT85 is in the 50th percentile; Farmall 85C is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Farmall 85C higher · +4 (+33%)LT8512
Farmall 85C16
Median Utility Tractor12
LT85 is in the 50th percentile; Farmall 85C is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
LT85 (A)Farmall 85C (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO LT85 | CaseIH Farmall 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | CaseIH | — |
| Model | LT85 | Farmall 85C | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO LT85 | CaseIH Farmall 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Fiat Powertrain Technologies (FPT) | — |
| Model | 4BT3.9T | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 85.4hp | 84hp | ▲ LT85+1.4 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ Farmall 85C+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 239ci | 274ci | ▲ Farmall 85C+35 ci · +15% |
| Bore | 4in | 4.1in | ▲ Farmall 85C+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 5.2in | ▲ Farmall 85C+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO LT85 | CaseIH Farmall 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-speed power shift | Mechanical Shuttle / Power Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO LT85 | CaseIH Farmall 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | Not recorded | 77.8in | — |
| Wheelbase | 92.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 8,450lb | 6,503lb | ▲ LT85+1,947 lb · +30% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO LT85 | CaseIH Farmall 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open Center | Same |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 18.4gpm | Not recorded | — |
| Pressure | 3,060psi | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | AGCO LT85 | CaseIH Farmall 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 11.00-16 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 16.9R38 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO LT85 | CaseIH Farmall 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 5,733lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO LT85 | CaseIH Farmall 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO LT85 | CaseIH Farmall 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO LT85 | CaseIH Farmall 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS/Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85.4 hp)B · 74th percentile (84 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 66th percentile (239 ci)B · 79th percentile (274 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 79th percentile (8,450 lb)B · 61st percentile (6,503 lb)
A · LT85B · Farmall 85CMedian Utility Tractor