
Head to head · Utility
AGCO LT85 vs CaseIH MX80C

Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH MX80C
Utility
- power
- 84 hp
- displacement
- 244 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
AGCOAGCO LT85
vs
CaseIHCaseIH MX80C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ LT85 higher · +1.4 hp (+2%)LT8585.4 hp
MX80C84 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
LT85 is in the 75th percentile; MX80C is in the 74th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MX80C higher · +5 ci (+2%)LT85239 ci
MX80C244 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
LT85 is in the 66th percentile; MX80C is in the 68th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedLT854
MX80C4
Median Utility Tractor4
LT85 is in the 50th percentile; MX80C is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MX80C higher · +4 (+33%)LT8512
MX80C16
Median Utility Tractor12
LT85 is in the 50th percentile; MX80C is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
LT85 (A)MX80C (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO LT85 | CaseIH MX80C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | CaseIH | — |
| Model | LT85 | MX80C | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO LT85 | CaseIH MX80C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Perkins | — |
| Model | 4BT3.9T | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 85.4hp | 84hp | ▲ LT85+1.4 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 239ci | 244ci | ▲ MX80C+5 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4in | 3.9in | ▲ LT85+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 5in | ▲ MX80C+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO LT85 | CaseIH MX80C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-speed power shift | 16-speed partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO LT85 | CaseIH MX80C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 171in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 110in | — |
| Wheelbase | 92.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 8,450lb | 10,580lb | ▲ MX80C+2,130 lb · +25% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO LT85 | CaseIH MX80C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Closed center pressure-flow compensating (PFC) | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 18.4gpm | Not recorded | — |
| Pressure | 3,060psi | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | AGCO LT85 | CaseIH MX80C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 11.00-16 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 16.9R38 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO LT85 | CaseIH MX80C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 5,733lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO LT85 | CaseIH MX80C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO LT85 | CaseIH MX80C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | 12V | Same |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO LT85 | CaseIH MX80C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 4.2gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO LT85 | CaseIH MX80C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85.4 hp)B · 74th percentile (84 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 66th percentile (239 ci)B · 68th percentile (244 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 79th percentile (8,450 lb)B · 87th percentile (10,580 lb)
A · LT85B · MX80CMedian Utility Tractor