Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO LT90A vs CaseIH Farmall 110C
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 110C
Utility
- power
- 107 hp
- displacement
- 207 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
AGCOAGCO LT90A
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 110C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ LT90A higher · +3 hp (+3%)LT90A110 hp
Farmall 110C107 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
LT90A is in the 87th percentile; Farmall 110C is in the 86th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ LT90A higher · +61 ci (+29%)LT90A268 ci
Farmall 110C207 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
LT90A is in the 76th percentile; Farmall 110C is in the 57th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedLT90A4
Farmall 110C4
Median Utility Tractor4
LT90A is in the 50th percentile; Farmall 110C is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ LT90A higher · +4 (+33%)LT90A16
Farmall 110C12
Median Utility Tractor12
LT90A is in the 73rd percentile; Farmall 110C is in the 50th · 4,941 models
LT90A (A)Farmall 110C (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO LT90A | CaseIH Farmall 110C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | CaseIH | — |
| Model | LT90A | Farmall 110C | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO LT90A | CaseIH Farmall 110C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Sisu | FPT | — |
| Power Output | 110hp | 107hp | ▲ LT90A+3 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 268ci | 207ci | ▲ LT90A+61 ci · +29% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 3.9in | ▲ LT90A+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 4.3in | ▲ LT90A+0.4 in · +9% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO LT90A | CaseIH Farmall 110C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Mechanical Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO LT90A | CaseIH Farmall 110C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 174in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 75.7in | — |
| Height | 107in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 8,820lb | 6,989lb | ▲ LT90A+1,831 lb · +26% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO LT90A | CaseIH Farmall 110C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO LT90A | CaseIH Farmall 110C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | 540 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO LT90A | CaseIH Farmall 110C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO LT90A | CaseIH Farmall 110C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO LT90A | CaseIH Farmall 110C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | AGCO LT90A | CaseIH Farmall 110C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Not recorded | Tier 4 | — |
| Control System | Not recorded | Selective catalytic reduction with cooled exhaust-gas recirculation | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO LT90A | CaseIH Farmall 110C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 87th percentile (110 hp)B · 86th percentile (107 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 76th percentile (268 ci)B · 57th percentile (207 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 81st percentile (8,820 lb)B · 67th percentile (6,989 lb)
A · LT90AB · Farmall 110CMedian Utility Tractor