AgcoModel A
Agco RT100a
Agricultural
- power
- 100 hp
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Agricultural
Agco RT100a vs Challenger MT525B
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT525B
Agricultural
- power
- 104 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
AgcoAgco RT100a
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT525B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ MT525B higher · +4 hp (+4%)RT100a100 hp
MT525B104 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
RT100a is in the 44th percentile; MT525B is in the 47th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ RT100a higher · +1 ci (<1%)RT100a403 ci
MT525B402 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
RT100a is in the 68th percentile; MT525B is in the 66th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedRT100a6
MT525B6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
RT100a is in the 74th percentile; MT525B is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT525B higher · +4,148 lb (+38%)RT100a11,052 lb
MT525B15,200 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
RT100a is in the 50th percentile; MT525B is in the 70th · 971 models
RT100a (A)MT525B (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Agco RT100a | Challenger MT525B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Agco | Challenger | — |
| Model | RT100a | MT525B | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Agco RT100a | Challenger MT525B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Not recorded | Perkins Diesel | — |
| Model | 6.6L | U092650K | — |
| Power Output | 100hp | 104hp | ▲ MT525B+4 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 403ci | 402ci | ▲ RT100a+1 ci · <1% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Agco RT100a | Challenger MT525B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Auto Quadrashift | Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Agco RT100a | Challenger MT525B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 169in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 81.1in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 113in | — |
| Operating Weight | 11,052lb | 15,200lb | ▲ MT525B+4,148 lb · +38% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Agco RT100a | Challenger MT525B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensating (PFC) | — |
Tires
| Spec | Agco RT100a | Challenger MT525B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 14.9R28 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 18.4R38 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Agco RT100a | Challenger MT525B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | II/III | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Category 2/3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 8,500lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Agco RT100a | Challenger MT525B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | Two-Wheel Drive | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic Wet Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Agco RT100a | Challenger MT525B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Agco RT100a | Challenger MT525B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 7.4gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Agco RT100a | Challenger MT525B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 44th percentile (100 hp)B · 47th percentile (104 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 68th percentile (403 ci)B · 66th percentile (402 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 50th percentile (11,052 lb)B · 70th percentile (15,200 lb)
A · RT100aB · MT525BMedian Agricultural Tractor