Head to head · Row Crop
AGCO RT115 vs CaseIH Puma 125
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Puma 125
Utility
- power
- 125 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
AGCOAGCO RT115
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 125
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Puma 125 higher · +4 hp (+3%)RT115121 hp
Puma 125125 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
RT115 is in the 41st percentile; Puma 125 is in the 42nd · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Puma 125 higher · +52 ci (+14%)RT115359 ci
Puma 125411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
RT115 is in the 41st percentile; Puma 125 is in the 63rd · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedRT1156
Puma 1256
Median Row Crop Tractor6
RT115 is in the 50th percentile; Puma 125 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ RT115 higher · +14 (+78%)RT11532
Puma 12518
Median Row Crop Tractor16
RT115 is in the 91st percentile; Puma 125 is in the 61st · 1,200 models
RT115 (A)Puma 125 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | CaseIH Puma 125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | CaseIH | — |
| Model | RT115 | Puma 125 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | CaseIH Puma 125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | CNH | — |
| Model | B5.9T | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 121hp | 125hp | ▲ Puma 125+4 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 359ci | 411ci | ▲ Puma 125+52 ci · +14% |
| Bore | 4in | 4.1in | ▲ Puma 125+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 5.2in | ▲ Puma 125+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | CaseIH Puma 125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partial power shift | 18-speed partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | CaseIH Puma 125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 173in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 88in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 109in | 118in | ▲ Puma 125+9 in · +8% |
| Operating Weight | 12,900lb | 13,260lb | ▲ Puma 125+360 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | CaseIH Puma 125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Closed center pressure flow compensated (PFC) | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 28.1gpm | Not recorded | — |
| Pressure | 2,280psi | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | CaseIH Puma 125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Power Rating | 120hp | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | CaseIH Puma 125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 9,440lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | CaseIH Puma 125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Four-wheel drive (4WD) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | CaseIH Puma 125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | CaseIH Puma 125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Cab | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 41st percentile (121 hp)B · 42nd percentile (125 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 41st percentile (359 ci)B · 63rd percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 91st percentile (32)B · 61st percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 54th percentile (12,900 lb)B · 58th percentile (13,260 lb)
A · RT115B · Puma 125Median Row Crop Tractor