Head to head · Row Crop
AGCO RT115 vs Fendt Favorit 512C
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt Favorit 512C
Utility
- power
- 125 hp
- displacement
- 380 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 44
AGCOAGCO RT115
vs
FendtFendt Favorit 512C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Favorit 512C higher · +4 hp (+3%)RT115121 hp
Favorit 512C125 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
RT115 is in the 41st percentile; Favorit 512C is in the 42nd · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Favorit 512C higher · +21 ci (+6%)RT115359 ci
Favorit 512C380 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
RT115 is in the 41st percentile; Favorit 512C is in the 49th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedRT1156
Favorit 512C6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
RT115 is in the 50th percentile; Favorit 512C is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Favorit 512C higher · +12 (+38%)RT11532
Favorit 512C44
Median Row Crop Tractor16
RT115 is in the 91st percentile; Favorit 512C is in the 99th · 1,200 models
RT115 (A)Favorit 512C (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Fendt Favorit 512C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Fendt | — |
| Model | RT115 | Favorit 512C | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Fendt Favorit 512C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | MWM | — |
| Model | B5.9T | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 121hp | 125hp | ▲ Favorit 512C+4 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ Favorit 512C+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 359ci | 380ci | ▲ Favorit 512C+21 ci · +6% |
| Bore | 4in | 4.1in | ▲ Favorit 512C+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 4.7in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Fendt Favorit 512C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partial power shift | Power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Fendt Favorit 512C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 173in | 176in | ▲ Favorit 512C+3 in · +2% |
| Width | 88in | 93.7in | ▲ Favorit 512C+5.7 in · +6% |
| Height | 109in | 111in | ▲ Favorit 512C+2 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 12,900lb | 11,927lb | ▲ RT115+973 lb · +8% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Fendt Favorit 512C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Not recorded | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 28.1gpm | Not recorded | — |
| Pressure | 2,280psi | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Fendt Favorit 512C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Power Rating | 120hp | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Fendt Favorit 512C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | II/III | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 9,440lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Fendt Favorit 512C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Fendt Favorit 512C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Fendt Favorit 512C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Cab | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 41st percentile (121 hp)B · 42nd percentile (125 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 41st percentile (359 ci)B · 49th percentile (380 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 91st percentile (32)B · 99th percentile (44)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 54th percentile (12,900 lb)B · 48th percentile (11,927 lb)
A · RT115B · Favorit 512CMedian Row Crop Tractor