
Head to head · Row Crop
AGCO RT115 vs Ford TW-10

Image not recorded
AGCOAGCO RT115
vs
FordFord TW-10
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ TW-10 higher · +2 hp (+2%)RT115121 hp
TW-10123 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
RT115 is in the 41st percentile; TW-10 is in the 41st · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ TW-10 higher · +42 ci (+12%)RT115359 ci
TW-10401 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
RT115 is in the 41st percentile; TW-10 is in the 51st · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedRT1156
TW-106
Median Row Crop Tractor6
RT115 is in the 50th percentile; TW-10 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ RT115 higher · +16 (+100%)RT11532
TW-1016
Median Row Crop Tractor16
RT115 is in the 91st percentile; TW-10 is in the 50th · 1,200 models
RT115 (A)TW-10 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Ford TW-10 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Ford | — |
| Model | RT115 | TW-10 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Ford TW-10 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Ford | — |
| Model | B5.9T | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 121hp | 123hp | ▲ TW-10+2 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ TW-10+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 359ci | 401ci | ▲ TW-10+42 ci · +12% |
| Bore | 4in | 4.4in | ▲ TW-10+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 4.4in | ▲ RT115+0.3 in · +7% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Ford TW-10 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partial power shift | Dual Power with cerametallic disc clutch | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Ford TW-10 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 173in | 176in | ▲ TW-10+3 in · +2% |
| Width | 88in | 104in | ▲ TW-10+16 in · +18% |
| Height | 109in | 113in | ▲ TW-10+4 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 12,900lb | 12,865lb | ▲ RT115+35 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Ford TW-10 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Open center | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 28.1gpm | Not recorded | — |
| Pressure | 2,280psi | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Ford TW-10 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | 540rpm | ▲ RT115+460 rpm · +85% |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
| Power Rating | 120hp | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Ford TW-10 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 9,440lb | 5,998lb | ▲ RT115+3,442 lb · +57% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Ford TW-10 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Differential hydraulic wet discs | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Ford TW-10 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Ford TW-10 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 5.3gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Ford TW-10 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Open operator station with ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 41st percentile (121 hp)B · 41st percentile (123 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 41st percentile (359 ci)B · 51st percentile (401 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 91st percentile (32)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 54th percentile (12,900 lb)B · 54th percentile (12,865 lb)
A · RT115B · TW-10Median Row Crop Tractor