
Head to head · Row Crop
AGCO RT115 vs Kubota M120

Image not recorded
KubotaModel B
Kubota M120
Utility
- power
- 120 hp
- displacement
- 356 ci
- Cylinders
- 5
- Forward gears
- 16
AGCOAGCO RT115
vs
KubotaKubota M120
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ RT115 higher · +1 hp (<1%)RT115121 hp
M120120 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
RT115 is in the 41st percentile; M120 is in the 39th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ RT115 higher · +3 ci (<1%)RT115359 ci
M120356 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
RT115 is in the 41st percentile; M120 is in the 40th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ RT115 higher · +1 (+20%)RT1156
M1205
Median Row Crop Tractor6
RT115 is in the 50th percentile; M120 is in the 31st · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ RT115 higher · +16 (+100%)RT11532
M12016
Median Row Crop Tractor16
RT115 is in the 91st percentile; M120 is in the 50th · 1,200 models
RT115 (A)M120 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Kubota M120 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Kubota | — |
| Model | RT115 | M120 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Kubota M120 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Kubota | — |
| Model | B5.9T | F5802TE2 | — |
| Power Output | 121hp | 120hp | ▲ RT115+1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,400RPM | ▲ M120+200 RPM · +9% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 5 | ▲ RT115+1 · +20% |
| Displacement | 359ci | 356ci | ▲ RT115+3 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4in | 4.3in | ▲ M120+0.3 in · +7% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 4.9in | ▲ M120+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Kubota M120 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partial power shift | Power shift dual range | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Kubota M120 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 173in | 168in | ▲ RT115+5 in · +3% |
| Width | 88in | 82.8in | ▲ RT115+5.2 in · +6% |
| Height | 109in | 108in | ▲ RT115+1 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 12,900lb | 9,040lb | ▲ RT115+3,860 lb · +43% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Kubota M120 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Open Center | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 28.1gpm | Not recorded | — |
| Pressure | 2,280psi | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Kubota M120 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Power Rating | 120hp | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Kubota M120 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 11.00-16F2 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 18.4R-38R1 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Kubota M120 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category II | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 9,440lb | 5,203lb | ▲ RT115+4,237 lb · +81% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Kubota M120 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Kubota M120 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Kubota M120 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 3.6gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO RT115 | Kubota M120 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 41st percentile (121 hp)B · 39th percentile (120 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 41st percentile (359 ci)B · 40th percentile (356 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 31st percentile (5)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 91st percentile (32)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 54th percentile (12,900 lb)B · 26th percentile (9,040 lb)
A · RT115B · M120Median Row Crop Tractor