AGCOModel A
AGCO RT120
Row Crop
- power
- 150 hp
- displacement
- 408 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
AGCO RT120 vs CaseIH Puma 150 X
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Puma 150 X
Row Crop
- power
- 150 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
AGCOAGCO RT120
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 150 X
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedRT120150 hp
Puma 150 X150 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
RT120 is in the 57th percentile; Puma 150 X is in the 57th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Puma 150 X higher · +3 ci (<1%)RT120408 ci
Puma 150 X411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
RT120 is in the 57th percentile; Puma 150 X is in the 60th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedRT1206
Puma 150 X6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
RT120 is in the 50th percentile; Puma 150 X is in the 50th · 1,417 models
RT120 (A)Puma 150 X (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO RT120 | CaseIH Puma 150 X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | CaseIH | — |
| Model | RT120 | Puma 150 X | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO RT120 | CaseIH Puma 150 X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | FPT | — |
| Power Output | 150hp | 150hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 408ci | 411ci | ▲ Puma 150 X+3 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5.2in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO RT120 | CaseIH Puma 150 X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously variable transmission (CVT) | Partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO RT120 | CaseIH Puma 150 X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Weight | 15,055lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO RT120 | CaseIH Puma 150 X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Pressure Flow Compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO RT120 | CaseIH Puma 150 X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | III/IIIN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III/II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO RT120 | CaseIH Puma 150 X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO RT120 | CaseIH Puma 150 X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 57th percentile (150 hp)B · 57th percentile (150 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 57th percentile (408 ci)B · 60th percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
A · RT120B · Puma 150 XMedian Row Crop Tractor