AGCOModel A
AGCO RT120
Row Crop
- power
- 150 hp
- displacement
- 408 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
AGCO RT120 vs Challenger MT485E
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT485E
Utility
- power
- 144 hp
- displacement
- 299 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
AGCOAGCO RT120
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT485E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ RT120 higher · +6 hp (+4%)RT120150 hp
MT485E144 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
RT120 is in the 57th percentile; MT485E is in the 52nd · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ RT120 higher · +109 ci (+36%)RT120408 ci
MT485E299 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
RT120 is in the 57th percentile; MT485E is in the 31st · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ RT120 higher · +2 (+50%)RT1206
MT485E4
Median Row Crop Tractor6
RT120 is in the 50th percentile; MT485E is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT485E higher · +377 lb (+3%)RT12015,055 lb
MT485E15,432 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
RT120 is in the 67th percentile; MT485E is in the 68th · 1,350 models
RT120 (A)MT485E (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO RT120 | Challenger MT485E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Challenger | — |
| Model | RT120 | MT485E | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO RT120 | Challenger MT485E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | AGCO | — |
| Model | Not recorded | AGCO Power | — |
| Power Output | 150hp | 144hp | ▲ RT120+6 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ RT120+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ RT120+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 408ci | 299ci | ▲ RT120+109 ci · +36% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.3in | ▲ MT485E+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5.3in | ▲ MT485E+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO RT120 | Challenger MT485E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously variable transmission (CVT) | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO RT120 | Challenger MT485E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | Not recorded | 72in | — |
| Operating Weight | 15,055lb | 15,432lb | ▲ MT485E+377 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO RT120 | Challenger MT485E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Open Center | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | Not recorded | 29.6gpm | — |
| Pressure | Not recorded | 2,725psi | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO RT120 | Challenger MT485E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | III/IIIN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III/II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO RT120 | Challenger MT485E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Front-wheel assist | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic Wet Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO RT120 | Challenger MT485E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | AGCO RT120 | Challenger MT485E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Not recorded | Tier IV | — |
| Control System | Not recorded | Selective Catalytic Reduction | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 57th percentile (150 hp)B · 52nd percentile (144 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 57th percentile (408 ci)B · 31st percentile (299 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 17th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 67th percentile (15,055 lb)B · 68th percentile (15,432 lb)
A · RT120B · MT485EMedian Row Crop Tractor