Image not recorded
AGCOModel A
AGCO RT135
Row Crop
- power
- 144 hp
- displacement
- 410 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
AGCO RT135 vs CaseIH Puma 145
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Puma 145
Row Crop
- power
- 146 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
AGCOAGCO RT135
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 145
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Puma 145 higher · +2 hp (+1%)RT135144 hp
Puma 145146 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
RT135 is in the 52nd percentile; Puma 145 is in the 55th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Puma 145 higher · +1 ci (<1%)RT135410 ci
Puma 145411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
RT135 is in the 58th percentile; Puma 145 is in the 60th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedRT1356
Puma 1456
Median Row Crop Tractor6
RT135 is in the 50th percentile; Puma 145 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ RT135 higher · +1,175 lb (+8%)RT13515,525 lb
Puma 14514,350 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
RT135 is in the 69th percentile; Puma 145 is in the 63rd · 1,350 models
RT135 (A)Puma 145 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO RT135 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | CaseIH | — |
| Model | RT135 | Puma 145 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO RT135 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | FPT | — |
| Power Output | 144hp | 146hp | ▲ Puma 145+2 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 410ci | 411ci | ▲ Puma 145+1 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5.2in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO RT135 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | AGCO CVT | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO RT135 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | Not recorded | 61.4in | — |
| Operating Weight | 15,525lb | 14,350lb | ▲ RT135+1,175 lb · +8% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO RT135 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Same |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 30.6gpm | Not recorded | — |
| Pressure | 2,748psi | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO RT135 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power Rating | 142hp | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO RT135 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category III | 2/3N | — |
| Hitch Category | 3 | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 15,240lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO RT135 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Electro-hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO RT135 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | 12 volts | Electric | — |
Emissions
| Spec | AGCO RT135 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Not recorded | Interim Tier 4 | — |
| Control System | Not recorded | Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO RT135 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 52nd percentile (144 hp)B · 55th percentile (146 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 58th percentile (410 ci)B · 60th percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 69th percentile (15,525 lb)B · 63rd percentile (14,350 lb)
A · RT135B · Puma 145Median Row Crop Tractor