AgcoModel A
Agco RT155
Agricultural
- power
- 155 hp
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Agco RT155 vs CaseIH Puma 155
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Puma 155
Utility
- power
- 155 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
AgcoAgco RT155
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 155
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedRT155155 hp
Puma 155155 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
RT155 is in the 70th percentile; Puma 155 is in the 70th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Puma 155 higher · +8 ci (+2%)RT155403 ci
Puma 155411 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
RT155 is in the 68th percentile; Puma 155 is in the 70th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedRT1556
Puma 1556
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
RT155 is in the 74th percentile; Puma 155 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ RT155 higher · +208 lb (+1%)RT15514,793 lb
Puma 15514,585 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
RT155 is in the 69th percentile; Puma 155 is in the 68th · 971 models
RT155 (A)Puma 155 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Agco RT155 | CaseIH Puma 155 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Agco | CaseIH | — |
| Model | RT155 | Puma 155 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Agco RT155 | CaseIH Puma 155 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Agco | CNH | — |
| Model | 6.6L | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 155hp | 155hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 403ci | 411ci | ▲ Puma 155+8 ci · +2% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5.2in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Agco RT155 | CaseIH Puma 155 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | 18-speed partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Agco RT155 | CaseIH Puma 155 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | Not recorded | 118in | — |
| Operating Weight | 14,793lb | 14,585lb | ▲ RT155+208 lb · +1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Agco RT155 | CaseIH Puma 155 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC) | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 29gpm | Not recorded | — |
| Pressure | 2,900psi | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Agco RT155 | CaseIH Puma 155 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category II-IIIN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | 2/3N | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 14,283lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Agco RT155 | CaseIH Puma 155 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Agco RT155 | CaseIH Puma 155 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 24V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
| Alternator Amperage | 150 | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Agco RT155 | CaseIH Puma 155 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fuel Capacity | 26.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Agco RT155 | CaseIH Puma 155 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 70th percentile (155 hp)B · 70th percentile (155 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 68th percentile (403 ci)B · 70th percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 69th percentile (14,793 lb)B · 68th percentile (14,585 lb)
A · RT155B · Puma 155Median Agricultural Tractor