AgcoModel A
Agco RT155
Agricultural
- power
- 155 hp
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Agco RT155 vs Ursus 1674 Forte
UrsusModel B
Ursus 1674 Forte
Agricultural
- power
- 156 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
AgcoAgco RT155
vs
UrsusUrsus 1674 Forte
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ 1674 Forte higher · +1 hp (<1%)RT155155 hp
1674 Forte156 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
RT155 is in the 70th percentile; 1674 Forte is in the 70th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ RT155 higher · +1 ci (<1%)RT155403 ci
1674 Forte402 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
RT155 is in the 68th percentile; 1674 Forte is in the 66th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedRT1556
1674 Forte6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
RT155 is in the 74th percentile; 1674 Forte is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ RT155 higher · +419 lb (+3%)RT15514,793 lb
1674 Forte14,374 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
RT155 is in the 69th percentile; 1674 Forte is in the 67th · 971 models
RT155 (A)1674 Forte (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Agco RT155 | Ursus 1674 Forte | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Agco | Ursus | — |
| Model | RT155 | 1674 Forte | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Agco RT155 | Ursus 1674 Forte | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Agco | Perkins | — |
| Model | 6.6L | 1106D-E66TA | — |
| Power Output | 155hp | 156hp | ▲ 1674 Forte+1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 403ci | 402ci | ▲ RT155+1 ci · <1% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.3in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.7in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Agco RT155 | Ursus 1674 Forte | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Agco RT155 | Ursus 1674 Forte | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 181in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 90.6in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 124in | — |
| Operating Weight | 14,793lb | 14,374lb | ▲ RT155+419 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Agco RT155 | Ursus 1674 Forte | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pump Flow Capacity | 29gpm | Not recorded | — |
| Pressure | 2,900psi | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Agco RT155 | Ursus 1674 Forte | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 14.9R28 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 20.8R38 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Agco RT155 | Ursus 1674 Forte | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category II-IIIN | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | III | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 14,283lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Agco RT155 | Ursus 1674 Forte | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Agco RT155 | Ursus 1674 Forte | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 24V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
| Alternator Amperage | 150 | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Agco RT155 | Ursus 1674 Forte | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fuel Capacity | 26.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 70th percentile (155 hp)B · 70th percentile (156 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 68th percentile (403 ci)B · 66th percentile (402 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 69th percentile (14,793 lb)B · 67th percentile (14,374 lb)
A · RT155B · 1674 ForteMedian Agricultural Tractor