Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO ST24A vs Challenger MT225B
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT225B
Utility
- power
- 22.5 hp
- displacement
- 68.5 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
AGCOAGCO ST24A
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT225B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedST24A22.5 hp
MT225B22.5 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
ST24A is in the 12th percentile; MT225B is in the 12th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedST24A68.5 ci
MT225B68.5 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
ST24A is in the 8th percentile; MT225B is in the 8th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedST24A3
MT225B3
Median Utility Tractor4
ST24A is in the 23rd percentile; MT225B is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ ST24A higher · +191 lb (+12%)ST24A1,800 lb
MT225B1,609 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
ST24A is in the 9th percentile; MT225B is in the 7th · 5,107 models
ST24A (A)MT225B (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO ST24A | Challenger MT225B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Challenger | — |
| Model | ST24A | MT225B | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO ST24A | Challenger MT225B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Iseki | Same |
| Model | Not recorded | E3312 | — |
| Power Output | 22.5hp | 22.5hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 68.5ci | 68.5ci | Same |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 3.1in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO ST24A | Challenger MT225B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic and gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO ST24A | Challenger MT225B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 106in | 102in | ▲ ST24A+4 in · +4% |
| Width | 39.4in | 39.4in | Same |
| Height | 77.2in | 65.5in | ▲ ST24A+11.7 in · +18% |
| Operating Weight | 1,800lb | 1,609lb | ▲ ST24A+191 lb · +12% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO ST24A | Challenger MT225B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO ST24A | Challenger MT225B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 882lb | 591lb | ▲ ST24A+291 lb · +49% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO ST24A | Challenger MT225B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic Power | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO ST24A | Challenger MT225B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.9gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO ST24A | Challenger MT225B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 12th percentile (22.5 hp)B · 12th percentile (22.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 8th percentile (68.5 ci)B · 8th percentile (68.5 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 9th percentile (1,800 lb)B · 7th percentile (1,609 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 12th percentile (106 in)B · 10th percentile (102 in)
A · ST24AB · MT225BMedian Utility Tractor