Head to head · Utility
AGCO ST25 vs CaseIH Farmall DX24E
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall DX24E
Utility
- power
- 24 hp
- displacement
- 61.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
AGCOAGCO ST25
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall DX24E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ ST25 higher · +0.3 hp (+1%)ST2524.3 hp
Farmall DX24E24 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
ST25 is in the 15th percentile; Farmall DX24E is in the 14th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ ST25 higher · +7.2 ci (+12%)ST2568.5 ci
Farmall DX24E61.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
ST25 is in the 8th percentile; Farmall DX24E is in the 7th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedST253
Farmall DX24E3
Median Utility Tractor4
ST25 is in the 23rd percentile; Farmall DX24E is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ ST25 higher · +265 lb (+20%)ST251,588 lb
Farmall DX24E1,323 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
ST25 is in the 7th percentile; Farmall DX24E is in the 3rd · 5,107 models
ST25 (A)Farmall DX24E (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO ST25 | CaseIH Farmall DX24E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | CaseIH | — |
| Model | ST25 | Farmall DX24E | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO ST25 | CaseIH Farmall DX24E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Shibaura | — |
| Model | E3112 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 24.3hp | 24hp | ▲ ST25+0.3 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,800RPM | 3,000RPM | ▲ Farmall DX24E+200 RPM · +7% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 68.5ci | 61.3ci | ▲ ST25+7.2 ci · +12% |
| Bore | 3.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.1in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO ST25 | CaseIH Farmall DX24E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO ST25 | CaseIH Farmall DX24E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 106in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 41in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 75.2in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 1,588lb | 1,323lb | ▲ ST25+265 lb · +20% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO ST25 | CaseIH Farmall DX24E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Pressure | 1,493psi | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Hydraulic Flow | 2.6gpm | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO ST25 | CaseIH Farmall DX24E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear PTO: 540 (1.375), Mid PTO: SAE 15 1.0 | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO ST25 | CaseIH Farmall DX24E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO ST25 | CaseIH Farmall DX24E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO ST25 | CaseIH Farmall DX24E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO ST25 | CaseIH Farmall DX24E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.9gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO ST25 | CaseIH Farmall DX24E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 15th percentile (24.3 hp)B · 14th percentile (24 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 8th percentile (68.5 ci)B · 7th percentile (61.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 7th percentile (1,588 lb)B · 3rd percentile (1,323 lb)
A · ST25B · Farmall DX24EMedian Utility Tractor