Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO ST30 vs Yanmar EF312T
Image not recorded
YanmarModel B
Yanmar EF312T
Utility
- power
- 30 hp
- displacement
- 91.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
AGCOAGCO ST30
vs
YanmarYanmar EF312T
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ ST30 higher · +0.3 hp (+1%)ST3030.3 hp
EF312T30 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
ST30 is in the 23rd percentile; EF312T is in the 22nd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ ST30 higher · +0.1 ci (<1%)ST3091.4 ci
EF312T91.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
ST30 is in the 18th percentile; EF312T is in the 17th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedST303
EF312T3
Median Utility Tractor4
ST30 is in the 23rd percentile; EF312T is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ ST30 higher · +1 (+13%)ST309
EF312T8
Median Utility Tractor12
ST30 is in the 35th percentile; EF312T is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
ST30 (A)EF312T (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO ST30 | Yanmar EF312T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Yanmar | — |
| Model | ST30 | EF312T | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO ST30 | Yanmar EF312T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Yanmar | — |
| Model | E3CD | 3TNV84 | — |
| Power Output | 30.3hp | 30hp | ▲ ST30+0.3 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,500RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 91.4ci | 91.3ci | ▲ ST30+0.1 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.3in | ▲ ST30+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.3in | 3.5in | ▲ EF312T+0.2 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO ST30 | Yanmar EF312T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Shuttle (synchro-mech) with dry disc clutch | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO ST30 | Yanmar EF312T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 117in | 112in | ▲ ST30+5 in · +4% |
| Width | 55.5in | 52in | ▲ ST30+3.5 in · +7% |
| Height | 79.3in | 53.5in | ▲ ST30+25.8 in · +48% |
| Operating Weight | 2,594lb | 2,028lb | ▲ ST30+566 lb · +28% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO ST30 | Yanmar EF312T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO ST30 | Yanmar EF312T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Continuous | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO ST30 | Yanmar EF312T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 2,205lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO ST30 | Yanmar EF312T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO ST30 | Yanmar EF312T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO ST30 | Yanmar EF312T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.9gal | 1.1gal | ▲ ST30+0.8 gal · +73% |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO ST30 | Yanmar EF312T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open operator station with two-post ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 23rd percentile (30.3 hp)B · 22nd percentile (30 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)B · 17th percentile (91.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 18th percentile (2,594 lb)B · 12th percentile (2,028 lb)
A · ST30B · EF312TMedian Utility Tractor