Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO ST30 vs Yanmar FV-310
YanmarModel B
Yanmar FV-310
Utility
- power
- 30.1 hp
- displacement
- 91.5 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
AGCOAGCO ST30
vs
YanmarYanmar FV-310
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ ST30 higher · +0.2 hp (<1%)ST3030.3 hp
FV-31030.1 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
ST30 is in the 23rd percentile; FV-310 is in the 23rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ FV-310 higher · +0.1 ci (<1%)ST3091.4 ci
FV-31091.5 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
ST30 is in the 18th percentile; FV-310 is in the 20th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedST303
FV-3103
Median Utility Tractor4
ST30 is in the 23rd percentile; FV-310 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
ST30 (A)FV-310 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO ST30 | Yanmar FV-310 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Yanmar | — |
| Model | ST30 | FV-310 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO ST30 | Yanmar FV-310 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Yanmar | — |
| Model | E3CD | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 30.3hp | 30.1hp | ▲ ST30+0.2 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,750RPM | ▲ FV-310+250 RPM · +10% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 91.4ci | 91.5ci | ▲ FV-310+0.1 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 3.3in | 3.5in | ▲ FV-310+0.2 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO ST30 | Yanmar FV-310 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO ST30 | Yanmar FV-310 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 117in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 55.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 79.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 2,594lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO ST30 | Yanmar FV-310 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO ST30 | Yanmar FV-310 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO ST30 | Yanmar FV-310 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO ST30 | Yanmar FV-310 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO ST30 | Yanmar FV-310 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | AGCO ST30 | Yanmar FV-310 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.9gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 23rd percentile (30.3 hp)B · 23rd percentile (30.1 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)B · 20th percentile (91.5 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
A · ST30B · FV-310Median Utility Tractor