AGCOModel A
AGCO ST32
Utility
- power
- 33 hp
- displacement
- 91.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
AGCO ST32 vs Daedong CK35 HST
Image not recorded
DaedongModel B
Daedong CK35 HST
Sub-Compact
- power
- 34 hp
- displacement
- 101 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
AGCOAGCO ST32
vs
DaedongDaedong CK35 HST
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ CK35 HST higher · +1 hp (+3%)ST3233 hp
CK35 HST34 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
ST32 is in the 25th percentile; CK35 HST is in the 26th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CK35 HST higher · +9.6 ci (+11%)ST3291.4 ci
CK35 HST101 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
ST32 is in the 18th percentile; CK35 HST is in the 23rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedST323
CK35 HST3
Median Utility Tractor4
ST32 is in the 23rd percentile; CK35 HST is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ CK35 HST higher · +621 lb (+24%)ST322,642 lb
CK35 HST3,263 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
ST32 is in the 18th percentile; CK35 HST is in the 26th · 5,107 models
ST32 (A)CK35 HST (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO ST32 | Daedong CK35 HST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Daedong | — |
| Model | ST32 | CK35 HST | — |
| Category | Utility | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO ST32 | Daedong CK35 HST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Daedong | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3A165LXB | — |
| Power Output | 33hp | 34hp | ▲ CK35 HST+1 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 91.4ci | 101ci | ▲ CK35 HST+9.6 ci · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO ST32 | Daedong CK35 HST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic Drive | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO ST32 | Daedong CK35 HST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 117in | 10.5in | ▲ ST32+107 in · +1014% |
| Width | 51in | 55.2in | ▲ CK35 HST+4.2 in · +8% |
| Height | 79.3in | 94.8in | ▲ CK35 HST+15.5 in · +20% |
| Operating Weight | 2,642lb | 3,263lb | ▲ CK35 HST+621 lb · +24% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO ST32 | Daedong CK35 HST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | AGCO ST32 | Daedong CK35 HST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 14-Jul | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 11.2-24 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO ST32 | Daedong CK35 HST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 1,764lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO ST32 | Daedong CK35 HST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO ST32 | Daedong CK35 HST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | AGCO ST32 | Daedong CK35 HST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 25th percentile (33 hp)B · 26th percentile (34 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)B · 23rd percentile (101 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 18th percentile (2,642 lb)B · 26th percentile (3,263 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 23rd percentile (117 in)B · 1st percentile (10.5 in)
A · ST32B · CK35 HSTMedian Utility Tractor