AgcoModel A
Agco ST52a
Sub-Compact
- power
- 52.1 hp
- displacement
- 174 ci
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Agco ST52a vs Renault Pales 210
RenaultModel B
Renault Pales 210
Utility
- power
- 52 hp
- displacement
- 173 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
AgcoAgco ST52a
vs
RenaultRenault Pales 210
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ ST52a higher · +0.1 hp (<1%)ST52a52.1 hp
Pales 21052 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
ST52a is in the 91st percentile; Pales 210 is in the 91st · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ ST52a higher · +1 ci (<1%)ST52a174 ci
Pales 210173 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
ST52a is in the 91st percentile; Pales 210 is in the 91st · 757 models
Forward Gears
▲ Pales 210 higher · +4 (+50%)ST52a8
Pales 21012
Median Sub-Compact Tractor9
ST52a is in the 40th percentile; Pales 210 is in the 73rd · 616 models
Operating Weight
▲ Pales 210 higher · +1,589 lb (+45%)ST52a3,494 lb
Pales 2105,083 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
ST52a is in the 66th percentile; Pales 210 is in the 93rd · 711 models
ST52a (A)Pales 210 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Agco ST52a | Renault Pales 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Agco | Renault | — |
| Model | ST52a | Pales 210 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Agco ST52a | Renault Pales 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Not recorded | Deutz | — |
| Model | Not recorded | F3L 912 | — |
| Power Output | 52.1hp | 52hp | ▲ ST52a+0.1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,350RPM | ▲ ST52a+250 RPM · +11% |
| Cylinders | Not recorded | 3 | — |
| Displacement | 174ci | 173ci | ▲ ST52a+1 ci · <1% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.9in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.7in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Agco ST52a | Renault Pales 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 8x8 synchro shuttle | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Agco ST52a | Renault Pales 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 140in | — |
| Width | 66in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 91.2in | 89.8in | ▲ ST52a+1.4 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 3,494lb | 5,083lb | ▲ Pales 210+1,589 lb · +45% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Agco ST52a | Renault Pales 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Agco ST52a | Renault Pales 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Cat I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,087lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Agco ST52a | Renault Pales 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 91st percentile (52.1 hp)B · 91st percentile (52 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 91st percentile (174 ci)B · 91st percentile (173 ci)
Forward Gears
median 9A · 40th percentile (8)B · 73rd percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 66th percentile (3,494 lb)B · 93rd percentile (5,083 lb)
Height
median 78.4 inA · 77th percentile (91.2 in)B · 75th percentile (89.8 in)
A · ST52aB · Pales 210Median Sub-Compact Tractor