Head to head · Utility
AGCO ST55 vs Massey Ferguson 264
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 264
Utility
- power
- 56 hp
- displacement
- 153 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
AGCOAGCO ST55
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 264
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 264 higher · +0.4 hp (<1%)ST5555.6 hp
26456 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
ST55 is in the 50th percentile; 264 is in the 51st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ ST55 higher · +20 ci (+13%)ST55173 ci
264153 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
ST55 is in the 46th percentile; 264 is in the 40th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ ST55 higher · +1 (+33%)ST554
2643
Median Utility Tractor4
ST55 is in the 50th percentile; 264 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedST5512
26412
Median Utility Tractor12
ST55 is in the 50th percentile; 264 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
ST55 (A)264 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | AGCO ST55 | Massey Ferguson 264 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | ST55 | 264 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | AGCO ST55 | Massey Ferguson 264 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | AT 3.152 | — |
| Power Output | 55.6hp | 56hp | ▲ 264+0.4 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ ST55+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ ST55+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 173ci | 153ci | ▲ ST55+20 ci · +13% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.6in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | AGCO ST55 | Massey Ferguson 264 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | AGCO ST55 | Massey Ferguson 264 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 137in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 72.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 98.8in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 4,417lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | AGCO ST55 | Massey Ferguson 264 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | AGCO ST55 | Massey Ferguson 264 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear PTO | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | AGCO ST55 | Massey Ferguson 264 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | I | III | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | AGCO ST55 | Massey Ferguson 264 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | AGCO ST55 | Massey Ferguson 264 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 50th percentile (55.6 hp)B · 51st percentile (56 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 46th percentile (173 ci)B · 40th percentile (153 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 50th percentile (12)
A · ST55B · 264Median Utility Tractor