Image not recorded
AgrinarModel A
Agrinar T-100
Utility
- power
- 97.9 hp
- displacement
- 305 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
Agrinar T-100 vs CaseIH Farmall 100C
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 100C
Row Crop
- power
- 99 hp
- displacement
- 207 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
AgrinarAgrinar T-100
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 100C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Farmall 100C higher · +1.1 hp (+1%)T-10097.9 hp
Farmall 100C99 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
T-100 is in the 82nd percentile; Farmall 100C is in the 82nd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ T-100 higher · +98 ci (+47%)T-100305 ci
Farmall 100C207 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
T-100 is in the 85th percentile; Farmall 100C is in the 57th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ T-100 higher · +2 (+50%)T-1006
Farmall 100C4
Median Utility Tractor4
T-100 is in the 93rd percentile; Farmall 100C is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Farmall 100C higher · +4 (+50%)T-1008
Farmall 100C12
Median Utility Tractor12
T-100 is in the 23rd percentile; Farmall 100C is in the 50th · 4,941 models
T-100 (A)Farmall 100C (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Agrinar T-100 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Agrinar | CaseIH | — |
| Model | T-100 | Farmall 100C | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Agrinar T-100 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | FPT | — |
| Model | 6PA305 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 97.9hp | 99hp | ▲ Farmall 100C+1.1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ T-100+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 305ci | 207ci | ▲ T-100+98 ci · +47% |
| Bore | 3.6in | 3.9in | ▲ Farmall 100C+0.3 in · +8% |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.3in | ▲ T-100+0.7 in · +16% |
Transmission
| Spec | Agrinar T-100 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | Mechanical Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Agrinar T-100 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 163in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 75.7in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 107in | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,850lb | 6,989lb | ▲ Farmall 100C+3,139 lb · +82% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Agrinar T-100 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Agrinar T-100 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Agrinar T-100 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Agrinar T-100 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Agrinar T-100 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Emissions
| Spec | Agrinar T-100 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Not recorded | Tier 4 | — |
| Control System | Not recorded | SCR and Cooled EGR | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Agrinar T-100 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.3gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Agrinar T-100 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 82nd percentile (97.9 hp)B · 82nd percentile (99 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 85th percentile (305 ci)B · 57th percentile (207 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 34th percentile (3,850 lb)B · 67th percentile (6,989 lb)
A · T-100B · Farmall 100CMedian Utility Tractor