Image not recorded
AgrinarModel A
Agrinar T-100
Utility
- power
- 97.9 hp
- displacement
- 305 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
Utility
Agricultural
How they compare
T-100 is in the 82nd percentile; 100-90 is in the 84th · 5,383 models
T-100 is in the 85th percentile; 100-90 is in the 85th · 5,580 models
T-100 is in the 93rd percentile; 100-90 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
T-100 is in the 23rd percentile; 100-90 is in the 64th · 4,941 models
Full comparison
| Spec | Agrinar T-100 | Fiat 100-90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Agrinar | Fiat | — |
| Model | T-100 | 100-90 | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural | — |
| Spec | Agrinar T-100 | Fiat 100-90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Fiat | — |
| Model | 6PA305 | 8065.06 | — |
| Power Output | 97.9hp | 100hp | ▲ 100-90+2.1 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ 100-90+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 305ci | 331ci | ▲ 100-90+26 ci · +9% |
| Bore | 3.6in | 3.9in | ▲ 100-90+0.3 in · +8% |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.5in | ▲ T-100+0.5 in · +11% |
| Spec | Agrinar T-100 | Fiat 100-90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | Synchronized | — |
| Spec | Agrinar T-100 | Fiat 100-90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 157in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 105in | — |
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 102in | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,850lb | 9,437lb | ▲ 100-90+5,587 lb · +145% |
| Spec | Agrinar T-100 | Fiat 100-90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Spec | Agrinar T-100 | Fiat 100-90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 7.50-20 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 16.9/14-38 | — |
| Spec | Agrinar T-100 | Fiat 100-90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Spec | Agrinar T-100 | Fiat 100-90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.3gal | 3.6gal | ▲ T-100+1.7 gal · +47% |
Category context