Image not recorded
AgrinarModel A
Agrinar T-100
Utility
- power
- 97.9 hp
- displacement
- 305 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
Agrinar T-100 vs McCormick Intl F105
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl F105
Agricultural
- power
- 98 hp
- displacement
- 268 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 15
AgrinarAgrinar T-100
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl F105
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ F105 higher · +0.1 hp (<1%)T-10097.9 hp
F10598 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
T-100 is in the 82nd percentile; F105 is in the 82nd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ T-100 higher · +37 ci (+14%)T-100305 ci
F105268 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
T-100 is in the 85th percentile; F105 is in the 75th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ T-100 higher · +2 (+50%)T-1006
F1054
Median Utility Tractor4
T-100 is in the 93rd percentile; F105 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ F105 higher · +7 (+88%)T-1008
F10515
Median Utility Tractor12
T-100 is in the 23rd percentile; F105 is in the 64th · 4,941 models
T-100 (A)F105 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Agrinar T-100 | McCormick Intl F105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Agrinar | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | T-100 | F105 | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural, Orchard/Vineyard | — |
Engine
| Spec | Agrinar T-100 | McCormick Intl F105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Perkins | Same |
| Model | 6PA305 | 1104C-44T | — |
| Power Output | 97.9hp | 98hp | ▲ F105+0.1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ T-100+200 RPM · +9% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ T-100+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 305ci | 268ci | ▲ T-100+37 ci · +14% |
| Bore | 3.6in | 4.1in | ▲ F105+0.5 in · +14% |
| Stroke | 5in | 5in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Agrinar T-100 | McCormick Intl F105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | Mechanical shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Agrinar T-100 | McCormick Intl F105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 146in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 49in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 90in | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,850lb | 5,766lb | ▲ F105+1,916 lb · +50% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Agrinar T-100 | McCormick Intl F105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Agrinar T-100 | McCormick Intl F105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category II | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Agrinar T-100 | McCormick Intl F105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Agrinar T-100 | McCormick Intl F105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Agrinar T-100 | McCormick Intl F105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.3gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Agrinar T-100 | McCormick Intl F105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 82nd percentile (97.9 hp)B · 82nd percentile (98 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 85th percentile (305 ci)B · 75th percentile (268 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 64th percentile (15)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 34th percentile (3,850 lb)B · 54th percentile (5,766 lb)
A · T-100B · F105Median Utility Tractor