Image not recorded
AgrinarModel A
Agrinar T-120
Agricultural
- power
- 119 hp
- displacement
- 354 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Agricultural
Agricultural
Agricultural
How they compare
T-120 is in the 56th percentile; AgroStar 6.31 is in the 57th · 1,028 models
T-120 is in the 52nd percentile; AgroStar 6.31 is in the 61st · 1,083 models
T-120 is in the 74th percentile; AgroStar 6.31 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
T-120 is in the 16th percentile; AgroStar 6.31 is in the 68th · 972 models
Full comparison
| Spec | Agrinar T-120 | Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.31 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Agrinar | Deutz-Fahr | — |
| Model | T-120 | AgroStar 6.31 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
| Spec | Agrinar T-120 | Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.31 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Deutz | — |
| Model | A6 354-4 | BF6L 913T | — |
| Power Output | 119hp | 120hp | ▲ AgroStar 6.31+1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ T-120+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 354ci | 374ci | ▲ AgroStar 6.31+20 ci · +6% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 4in | ▲ AgroStar 6.31+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.9in | ▲ T-120+0.1 in · +2% |
| Spec | Agrinar T-120 | Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.31 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
| Spec | Agrinar T-120 | Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.31 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 187in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 111in | — |
| Operating Weight | 4,580lb | 10,231lb | ▲ AgroStar 6.31+5,651 lb · +123% |
| Spec | Agrinar T-120 | Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.31 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 10.00x16 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 18.4x34 | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Agrinar T-120 | Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.31 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | MFWD 4WD | — |
| Spec | Agrinar T-120 | Deutz-Fahr AgroStar 6.31 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.3gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context