AgrinarModel A
Agrinar T-85
Utility
- power
- 80.9 hp
- displacement
- 244 ci
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Agrinar T-85 vs CaseIH Farmall 75C
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 75C
Utility
- power
- 76 hp
- displacement
- 195 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
AgrinarAgrinar T-85
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 75C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ T-85 higher · +4.9 hp (+6%)T-8580.9 hp
Farmall 75C76 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
T-85 is in the 72nd percentile; Farmall 75C is in the 69th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ T-85 higher · +49 ci (+25%)T-85244 ci
Farmall 75C195 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
T-85 is in the 69th percentile; Farmall 75C is in the 52nd · 5,580 models
Operating Weight
▲ Farmall 75C higher · +2,776 lb (+93%)T-853,000 lb
Farmall 75C5,776 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
T-85 is in the 23rd percentile; Farmall 75C is in the 54th · 5,107 models
T-85 (A)Farmall 75C (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Agrinar | CaseIH | — |
| Model | T-85 | Farmall 75C | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | International | Fiat Powertrain Technologies (FPT) | — |
| Model | P4000 | Turbocharged Intercooled Diesel | — |
| Power Output | 80.9hp | 76hp | ▲ T-85+4.9 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ Farmall 75C+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | Not recorded | 4 | — |
| Displacement | 244ci | 195ci | ▲ T-85+49 ci · +25% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.9in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.1in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Mechanical Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Weight | 3,000lb | 5,776lb | ▲ Farmall 75C+2,776 lb · +93% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 4gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 72nd percentile (80.9 hp)B · 69th percentile (76 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 69th percentile (244 ci)B · 52nd percentile (195 ci)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 23rd percentile (3,000 lb)B · 54th percentile (5,776 lb)
A · T-85B · Farmall 75CMedian Utility Tractor