AgrinarModel A
Agrinar T-85
Utility
- power
- 80.9 hp
- displacement
- 244 ci
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Agrinar T-85 vs Ford 6410 Mark III
FordModel B
Ford 6410 Mark III
Utility
- power
- 80 hp
- displacement
- 268 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
AgrinarAgrinar T-85
vs
FordFord 6410 Mark III
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ T-85 higher · +0.9 hp (+1%)T-8580.9 hp
6410 Mark III80 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
T-85 is in the 72nd percentile; 6410 Mark III is in the 71st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 6410 Mark III higher · +24 ci (+10%)T-85244 ci
6410 Mark III268 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
T-85 is in the 69th percentile; 6410 Mark III is in the 75th · 5,580 models
Operating Weight
▲ 6410 Mark III higher · +4,540 lb (+151%)T-853,000 lb
6410 Mark III7,540 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
T-85 is in the 23rd percentile; 6410 Mark III is in the 72nd · 5,107 models
T-85 (A)6410 Mark III (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | Ford 6410 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Agrinar | Ford | — |
| Model | T-85 | 6410 Mark III | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | Ford 6410 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | International | Ford | — |
| Model | P4000 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 80.9hp | 80hp | ▲ T-85+0.9 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,070RPM | ▲ T-85+130 RPM · +6% |
| Cylinders | Not recorded | 4 | — |
| Displacement | 244ci | 268ci | ▲ 6410 Mark III+24 ci · +10% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.4in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.4in | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | Ford 6410 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 116in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 106in | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,000lb | 7,540lb | ▲ 6410 Mark III+4,540 lb · +151% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | Ford 6410 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | Ford 6410 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | 3 | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | Ford 6410 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | Ford 6410 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | Ford 6410 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 4gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 72nd percentile (80.9 hp)B · 71st percentile (80 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 69th percentile (244 ci)B · 75th percentile (268 ci)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 23rd percentile (3,000 lb)B · 72nd percentile (7,540 lb)
A · T-85B · 6410 Mark IIIMedian Utility Tractor