AgrinarModel A
Agrinar T-85
Utility
- power
- 80.9 hp
- displacement
- 244 ci
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Agrinar T-85 vs Hesston 80-90
Image not recorded
HesstonModel B
Hesston 80-90
Utility
- power
- 80 hp
- displacement
- 239 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
AgrinarAgrinar T-85
vs
HesstonHesston 80-90
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ T-85 higher · +0.9 hp (+1%)T-8580.9 hp
80-9080 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
T-85 is in the 72nd percentile; 80-90 is in the 71st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ T-85 higher · +5 ci (+2%)T-85244 ci
80-90239 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
T-85 is in the 69th percentile; 80-90 is in the 65th · 5,580 models
Operating Weight
▲ 80-90 higher · +3,930 lb (+131%)T-853,000 lb
80-906,930 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
T-85 is in the 23rd percentile; 80-90 is in the 66th · 5,107 models
T-85 (A)80-90 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | Hesston 80-90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Agrinar | Hesston | — |
| Model | T-85 | 80-90 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | Hesston 80-90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | International | Fiat | — |
| Model | P4000 | 8045.05 | — |
| Power Output | 80.9hp | 80hp | ▲ T-85+0.9 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ 80-90+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | Not recorded | 4 | — |
| Displacement | 244ci | 239ci | ▲ T-85+5 ci · +2% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | Hesston 80-90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Synchromesh | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | Hesston 80-90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 135in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 104in | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,000lb | 6,930lb | ▲ 80-90+3,930 lb · +131% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | Hesston 80-90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | Hesston 80-90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category I/II | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | Hesston 80-90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | Hesston 80-90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Agrinar T-85 | Hesston 80-90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 4gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 72nd percentile (80.9 hp)B · 71st percentile (80 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 69th percentile (244 ci)B · 65th percentile (239 ci)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 23rd percentile (3,000 lb)B · 66th percentile (6,930 lb)
A · T-85B · 80-90Median Utility Tractor