Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers 185
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 301 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Row Crop
Allis Chalmers 185 vs Cockshutt 570
Image not recorded
CockshuttModel B
Cockshutt 570
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 298 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 6
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers 185
vs
CockshuttCockshutt 570
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Displacement
▲ 185 higher · +3 ci (+1%)185301 ci
570298 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
185 is in the 32nd percentile; 570 is in the 31st · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied1856
5706
Median Row Crop Tractor6
185 is in the 50th percentile; 570 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ 185 higher · +2 (+33%)1858
5706
Median Row Crop Tractor16
185 is in the 16th percentile; 570 is in the 11th · 1,200 models
Operating Weight
▲ 570 higher · +290 lb (+4%)1856,710 lb
5707,000 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
185 is in the 14th percentile; 570 is in the 16th · 1,350 models
185 (A)570 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 185 | Cockshutt 570 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Cockshutt | — |
| Model | 185 | 570 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 185 | Cockshutt 570 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis-Chalmers | Hercules | — |
| Model | Allis-Chalmers | 4.9L 6-cyl Diesel | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 1,650RPM | ▲ 185+550 RPM · +33% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 301ci | 298ci | ▲ 185+3 ci · +1% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.8in | ▲ 185+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 4.5in | ▲ 570+0.2 in · +5% |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 185 | Cockshutt 570 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partial power shift | Unsynchronized Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 185 | Cockshutt 570 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 158in | 138in | ▲ 185+20 in · +14% |
| Width | 76.5in | 53.5in | ▲ 185+23 in · +43% |
| Height | Not recorded | 70in | — |
| Operating Weight | 6,710lb | 7,000lb | ▲ 570+290 lb · +4% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 185 | Cockshutt 570 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power Assist | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 185 | Cockshutt 570 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuous | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 185 | Cockshutt 570 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 185 | Cockshutt 570 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Tricycle | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power Assist | — |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical band and disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 185 | Cockshutt 570 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 185 | Cockshutt 570 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 4.3gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 185 | Cockshutt 570 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open operator station | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 32nd percentile (301 ci)B · 31st percentile (298 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 16th percentile (8)B · 11th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 14th percentile (6,710 lb)B · 16th percentile (7,000 lb)
Length
median 180 inA · 22nd percentile (158 in)B · 10th percentile (138 in)
A · 185B · 570Median Row Crop Tractor