Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers 5045
Utility
- power
- 44 hp
- displacement
- 159 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
Allis Chalmers 5045 vs McCormick Intl CT50U
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl CT50U
Utility
- power
- 43 hp
- displacement
- 153 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers 5045
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl CT50U
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 5045 higher · +1 hp (+2%)504544 hp
CT50U43 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
5045 is in the 38th percentile; CT50U is in the 37th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 5045 higher · +6 ci (+4%)5045159 ci
CT50U153 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
5045 is in the 43rd percentile; CT50U is in the 41st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ CT50U higher · +1 (+33%)50453
CT50U4
Median Utility Tractor4
5045 is in the 23rd percentile; CT50U is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ CT50U higher · +8 (+100%)50458
CT50U16
Median Utility Tractor12
5045 is in the 23rd percentile; CT50U is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
5045 (A)CT50U (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5045 | McCormick Intl CT50U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | 5045 | CT50U | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5045 | McCormick Intl CT50U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fiat | Mitsubishi | — |
| Power Output | 44hp | 43hp | ▲ 5045+1 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,600RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ CT50U+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 159ci | 153ci | ▲ 5045+6 ci · +4% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.5in | ▲ 5045+0.4 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 4.1in | ▲ 5045+0.2 in · +5% |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5045 | McCormick Intl CT50U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partially synchronized | Mechanical shuttle shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5045 | McCormick Intl CT50U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 117in | 125in | ▲ CT50U+8 in · +7% |
| Width | 61in | 65.7in | ▲ CT50U+4.7 in · +8% |
| Height | Not recorded | 94.4in | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,850lb | 5,005lb | ▲ CT50U+1,155 lb · +30% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5045 | McCormick Intl CT50U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic power steering | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5045 | McCormick Intl CT50U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5045 | McCormick Intl CT50U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5045 | McCormick Intl CT50U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic power steering | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5045 | McCormick Intl CT50U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5045 | McCormick Intl CT50U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.6gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5045 | McCormick Intl CT50U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open operator station | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 38th percentile (44 hp)B · 37th percentile (43 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 43rd percentile (159 ci)B · 41st percentile (153 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 34th percentile (3,850 lb)B · 48th percentile (5,005 lb)
A · 5045B · CT50UMedian Utility Tractor