Head to head · Utility

Allis Chalmers 5050 vs Deutz-Fahr Intrac 2002

Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersModel A

Allis Chalmers 5050

Utility

power
50 hp
displacement
168 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
8
Full 5050 specs
Image not recorded
Deutz-FahrModel B

Deutz-Fahr Intrac 2002

Tool Carrier

power
50.3 hp
displacement
173 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
8
Full Intrac 2002 specs
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers 5050
vs
Deutz-FahrDeutz-Fahr Intrac 2002

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 3,933–5,720

Engine Power

▲ Intrac 2002 higher · +0.3 hp (<1%)
505050 hp
Intrac 200250.3 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

5050 is in the 45th percentile; Intrac 2002 is in the 46th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ Intrac 2002 higher · +5 ci (+3%)
5050168 ci
Intrac 2002173 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

5050 is in the 45th percentile; Intrac 2002 is in the 46th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
50503
Intrac 20023
Median Utility Tractor4

5050 is in the 23rd percentile; Intrac 2002 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
50508
Intrac 20028
Median Utility Tractor12

5050 is in the 23rd percentile; Intrac 2002 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models

5050 (A)Intrac 2002 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecAllis Chalmers 5050Deutz-Fahr Intrac 2002Difference
ManufacturerAllis ChalmersDeutz-Fahr—
Model5050Intrac 2002—
CategoryUtilityTool Carrier—

Engine

SpecAllis Chalmers 5050Deutz-Fahr Intrac 2002Difference
ManufacturerFiatDeutz—
ModelFiatF3L912—
Power Output50hp50.3hp▲ Intrac 2002+0.3 hp · <1%
Rated RPM2,700RPM2,300RPM▲ 5050+400 RPM · +17%
Cylinders33Same
Displacement168ci173ci▲ Intrac 2002+5 ci · +3%
Bore4.1in3.9in▲ 5050+0.2 in · +5%
Stroke4.3in4.7in▲ Intrac 2002+0.4 in · +9%

Transmission

SpecAllis Chalmers 5050Deutz-Fahr Intrac 2002Difference
TypePartially synchronizedSynchronized—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecAllis Chalmers 5050Deutz-Fahr Intrac 2002Difference
Length119in167in▲ Intrac 2002+48 in · +40%
Width67in74.4in▲ Intrac 2002+7.4 in · +11%
Height59.3in98.4in▲ Intrac 2002+39.1 in · +66%
Operating Weight4,410lb5,372lb▲ Intrac 2002+962 lb · +22%

Hydraulics

SpecAllis Chalmers 5050Deutz-Fahr Intrac 2002Difference
System TypeOpen centerNot recorded—
Steering TypePower assistManual—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecAllis Chalmers 5050Deutz-Fahr Intrac 2002Difference
TypeIndependentNot recorded—
Speed 1540rpmNot recorded—

Tires

SpecAllis Chalmers 5050Deutz-Fahr Intrac 2002Difference
Front Tire Size7.50-16Not recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecAllis Chalmers 5050Deutz-Fahr Intrac 2002Difference
Hitch TypeII/IRear Type: II/I—
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—
Hitch Capacity3,197lbNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecAllis Chalmers 5050Deutz-Fahr Intrac 2002Difference
Chassis Type4x2 2WD4x2 2WDSame
Drive Type2WD2WDSame
Steering TypePower assistManual—
Brake TypeDifferential mechanical contracting bandNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecAllis Chalmers 5050Deutz-Fahr Intrac 2002Difference
Starter TypeElectricNot recorded—

Capacities

SpecAllis Chalmers 5050Deutz-Fahr Intrac 2002Difference
Coolant3.6galNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecAllis Chalmers 5050Deutz-Fahr Intrac 2002Difference
TypeOpen operator stationCab—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 45th percentile (50 hp)B · 46th percentile (50.3 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 45th percentile (168 ci)B · 46th percentile (173 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)

Forward Gears

median 12
A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 23rd percentile (8)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 42nd percentile (4,410 lb)B · 50th percentile (5,372 lb)
A · 5050B · Intrac 2002Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageAllis Chalmers 5050Full spec pageDeutz-Fahr Intrac 2002