Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers 5050
Utility
- power
- 50 hp
- displacement
- 168 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
Allis Chalmers 5050 vs Volvo T42
VolvoModel B
Volvo T42
Lawn and Garden
- power
- 48 hp
- displacement
- 273 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 5
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers 5050
vs
VolvoVolvo T42
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 5050 higher · +2 hp (+4%)505050 hp
T4248 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
5050 is in the 45th percentile; T42 is in the 43rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ T42 higher · +105 ci (+63%)5050168 ci
T42273 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
5050 is in the 45th percentile; T42 is in the 78th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ T42 higher · +1 (+33%)50503
T424
Median Utility Tractor4
5050 is in the 23rd percentile; T42 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 5050 higher · +3 (+60%)50508
T425
Median Utility Tractor12
5050 is in the 23rd percentile; T42 is in the 6th · 4,941 models
5050 (A)T42 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5050 | Volvo T42 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Volvo | — |
| Model | 5050 | T42 | — |
| Category | Utility | Lawn and Garden | — |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5050 | Volvo T42 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fiat | Volvo | — |
| Model | Fiat | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 50hp | 48hp | ▲ 5050+2 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,700RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ T42+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 168ci | 273ci | ▲ T42+105 ci · +63% |
| Bore | 4.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.3in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5050 | Volvo T42 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partially synchronized | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5050 | Volvo T42 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 119in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 67in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 59.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 70.9in | — |
| Operating Weight | 4,410lb | 5,402lb | ▲ T42+992 lb · +22% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5050 | Volvo T42 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5050 | Volvo T42 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5050 | Volvo T42 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 7.50-16 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5050 | Volvo T42 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | II/I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,197lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5050 | Volvo T42 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical contracting band | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5050 | Volvo T42 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5050 | Volvo T42 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.6gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 5050 | Volvo T42 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open operator station | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 45th percentile (50 hp)B · 43rd percentile (48 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 45th percentile (168 ci)B · 78th percentile (273 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 6th percentile (5)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 42nd percentile (4,410 lb)B · 50th percentile (5,402 lb)
A · 5050B · T42Median Utility Tractor