Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers 615
Specialized
- power
- 56.9 hp
- displacement
- 160 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
Head to head · Specialized
Allis Chalmers 615 vs McCormick Intl CT65U
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl CT65U
Utility
- power
- 57 hp
- displacement
- 203 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers 615
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl CT65U
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Specialized
Engine Power
▲ CT65U higher · +0.1 hp (<1%)61556.9 hp
CT65U57 hp
Median Specialized Tractor62 hp
615 is in the 38th percentile; CT65U is in the 39th · 55 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CT65U higher · +43 ci (+27%)615160 ci
CT65U203 ci
Median Specialized Tractor239 ci
615 is in the 37th percentile; CT65U is in the 39th · 56 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied6154
CT65U4
Median Specialized Tractor4
615 is in the 50th percentile; CT65U is in the 50th · 58 models
Forward Gears
▲ CT65U higher · +12 (+300%)6154
CT65U16
Median Specialized Tractor4
615 is in the 50th percentile; CT65U is in the 99th · 43 models
615 (A)CT65U (B)Median Specialized Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 615 | McCormick Intl CT65U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | 615 | CT65U | — |
| Category | Specialized, Backhoe Loader | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 615 | McCormick Intl CT65U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | Allis-Chalmers | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 56.9hp | 57hp | ▲ CT65U+0.1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ CT65U+500 RPM · +25% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 160ci | 203ci | ▲ CT65U+43 ci · +27% |
| Bore | 3.6in | 3.7in | ▲ CT65U+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.6in | 4.7in | ▲ CT65U+1.1 in · +31% |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 615 | McCormick Intl CT65U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Power shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 615 | McCormick Intl CT65U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 140in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 66.9in | — |
| Height | 63in | 96in | ▲ CT65U+33 in · +52% |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 5,401lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 615 | McCormick Intl CT65U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 615 | McCormick Intl CT65U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 615 | McCormick Intl CT65U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category I | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 615 | McCormick Intl CT65U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
| Brake Type | Mechanical drum | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 615 | McCormick Intl CT65U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 615 | McCormick Intl CT65U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 2.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 615 | McCormick Intl CT65U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open operator station | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 62 hpA · 38th percentile (56.9 hp)B · 39th percentile (57 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 239 ciA · 37th percentile (160 ci)B · 39th percentile (203 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 99th percentile (16)
Height
median 108 inA · 5th percentile (63 in)B · 32nd percentile (96 in)
A · 615B · CT65UMedian Specialized Tractor