Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers 620
Utility
- power
- 19.5 hp
- displacement
- 49.8 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Allis Chalmers 620 vs Ford 1120
Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers 620
vs
FordFord 1120
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 1120 higher · +0.2 hp (+1%)62019.5 hp
112019.7 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
620 is in the 8th percentile; 1120 is in the 8th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1120 higher · +3.8 ci (+8%)62049.8 ci
112053.6 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
620 is in the 3rd percentile; 1120 is in the 3rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 1120 higher · +1 (+50%)6202
11203
Median Utility Tractor4
620 is in the 3rd percentile; 1120 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 620 higher · +161 lb (+12%)6201,499 lb
11201,338 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
620 is in the 6th percentile; 1120 is in the 4th · 5,107 models
620 (A)1120 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Ford 1120 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Ford | — |
| Model | 620 | 1120 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Ford 1120 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Onan | Shibaura | — |
| Model | CCKB | S723 | — |
| Power Output | 19.5hp | 19.7hp | ▲ 1120+0.2 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 3,600RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ 620+1,100 RPM · +44% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ 1120+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 49.8ci | 53.6ci | ▲ 1120+3.8 ci · +8% |
| Bore | 3.3in | 2.8in | ▲ 620+0.5 in · +18% |
| Stroke | 3in | 2.8in | ▲ 620+0.2 in · +7% |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Ford 1120 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Gear type | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Ford 1120 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 82.7in | 106in | ▲ 1120+23.3 in · +28% |
| Width | 47.6in | 40.9in | ▲ 620+6.7 in · +16% |
| Height | 42.9in | 80.1in | ▲ 1120+37.2 in · +87% |
| Operating Weight | 1,499lb | 1,338lb | ▲ 620+161 lb · +12% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Ford 1120 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Ford 1120 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Transmission | — |
| Speed 1 | 2,000rpm | 540rpm | ▲ 620+1,460 rpm · +270% |
| Speed 2 | 2,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Ford 1120 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-point hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 1,410lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Ford 1120 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Expanding shoe | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Ford 1120 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Ford 1120 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 0.9gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Ford 1120 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Open with two-post ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 8th percentile (19.5 hp)B · 8th percentile (19.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 3rd percentile (49.8 ci)B · 3rd percentile (53.6 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 6th percentile (1,499 lb)B · 4th percentile (1,338 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 3rd percentile (82.7 in)B · 13th percentile (106 in)
A · 620B · 1120Median Utility Tractor