Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers 620
Utility
- power
- 19.5 hp
- displacement
- 49.8 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Allis Chalmers 620 vs Jinma JM-204
Image not recorded
JinmaModel B
Jinma JM-204
Utility
- power
- 20 hp
- displacement
- 77.6 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 12
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers 620
vs
JinmaJinma JM-204
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ JM-204 higher · +0.5 hp (+3%)62019.5 hp
JM-20420 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
620 is in the 8th percentile; JM-204 is in the 8th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ JM-204 higher · +27.8 ci (+56%)62049.8 ci
JM-20477.6 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
620 is in the 3rd percentile; JM-204 is in the 11th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied6202
JM-2042
Median Utility Tractor4
620 is in the 3rd percentile; JM-204 is in the 3rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ JM-204 higher · +1,114 lb (+74%)6201,499 lb
JM-2042,613 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
620 is in the 6th percentile; JM-204 is in the 18th · 5,107 models
620 (A)JM-204 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Jinma JM-204 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Jinma | — |
| Model | 620 | JM-204 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Jinma JM-204 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Onan | Jinma | — |
| Model | CCKB | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 19.5hp | 20hp | ▲ JM-204+0.5 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 3,600RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 620+1,400 RPM · +64% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 2 | Same |
| Displacement | 49.8ci | 77.6ci | ▲ JM-204+27.8 ci · +56% |
| Bore | 3.3in | 3.5in | ▲ JM-204+0.2 in · +6% |
| Stroke | 3in | 3.9in | ▲ JM-204+0.9 in · +30% |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Jinma JM-204 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Jinma JM-204 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 82.7in | 105in | ▲ JM-204+22.3 in · +27% |
| Width | 47.6in | 48.6in | ▲ JM-204+1 in · +2% |
| Height | 42.9in | 51.2in | ▲ JM-204+8.3 in · +19% |
| Operating Weight | 1,499lb | 2,613lb | ▲ JM-204+1,114 lb · +74% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Jinma JM-204 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Jinma JM-204 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | 2,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 2,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Jinma JM-204 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Jinma JM-204 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Jinma JM-204 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Jinma JM-204 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 2.6gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Jinma JM-204 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 8th percentile (19.5 hp)B · 8th percentile (20 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 3rd percentile (49.8 ci)B · 11th percentile (77.6 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 3rd percentile (2)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 6th percentile (1,499 lb)B · 18th percentile (2,613 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 3rd percentile (82.7 in)B · 11th percentile (105 in)
A · 620B · JM-204Median Utility Tractor