Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers 620
Utility
- power
- 19.5 hp
- displacement
- 49.8 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Allis Chalmers 620 vs Mitsubishi GS200
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi GS200
Utility
- power
- 19.7 hp
- displacement
- 68.7 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers 620
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi GS200
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ GS200 higher · +0.2 hp (+1%)62019.5 hp
GS20019.7 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
620 is in the 8th percentile; GS200 is in the 8th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GS200 higher · +18.9 ci (+38%)62049.8 ci
GS20068.7 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
620 is in the 3rd percentile; GS200 is in the 9th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ GS200 higher · +1 (+50%)6202
GS2003
Median Utility Tractor4
620 is in the 3rd percentile; GS200 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ GS200 higher · +320 lb (+21%)6201,499 lb
GS2001,819 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
620 is in the 6th percentile; GS200 is in the 10th · 5,107 models
620 (A)GS200 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Mitsubishi GS200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | 620 | GS200 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Mitsubishi GS200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Onan | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | CCKB | S3L | — |
| Power Output | 19.5hp | 19.7hp | ▲ GS200+0.2 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 3,600RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ 620+1,100 RPM · +44% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ GS200+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 49.8ci | 68.7ci | ▲ GS200+18.9 ci · +38% |
| Bore | 3.3in | 3.1in | ▲ 620+0.2 in · +6% |
| Stroke | 3in | 3.1in | ▲ GS200+0.1 in · +3% |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Mitsubishi GS200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Mitsubishi GS200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 82.7in | 104in | ▲ GS200+21.3 in · +26% |
| Width | 47.6in | 43.1in | ▲ 620+4.5 in · +10% |
| Height | 42.9in | 74.8in | ▲ GS200+31.9 in · +74% |
| Operating Weight | 1,499lb | 1,819lb | ▲ GS200+320 lb · +21% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Mitsubishi GS200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Mitsubishi GS200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | 2,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 2,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Mitsubishi GS200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | JIS0 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Mitsubishi GS200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Mitsubishi GS200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Mitsubishi GS200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 8th percentile (19.5 hp)B · 8th percentile (19.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 3rd percentile (49.8 ci)B · 9th percentile (68.7 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 6th percentile (1,499 lb)B · 10th percentile (1,819 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 3rd percentile (82.7 in)B · 11th percentile (104 in)
A · 620B · GS200Median Utility Tractor