Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers 620
Utility
- power
- 19.5 hp
- displacement
- 49.8 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Allis Chalmers 620 vs Mitsubishi R2000
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi R2000
Sub-Compact
- power
- 19.7 hp
- displacement
- 60.6 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 6
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers 620
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi R2000
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ R2000 higher · +0.2 hp (+1%)62019.5 hp
R200019.7 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
620 is in the 22nd percentile; R2000 is in the 23rd · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ R2000 higher · +10.8 ci (+22%)62049.8 ci
R200060.6 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
620 is in the 9th percentile; R2000 is in the 19th · 757 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied6202
R20002
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
620 is in the 11th percentile; R2000 is in the 11th · 802 models
Operating Weight
▲ R2000 higher · +287 lb (+19%)6201,499 lb
R20001,786 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
620 is in the 22nd percentile; R2000 is in the 32nd · 711 models
620 (A)R2000 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Mitsubishi R2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | 620 | R2000 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Mitsubishi R2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Onan | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | CCKB | 2DQ | — |
| Power Output | 19.5hp | 19.7hp | ▲ R2000+0.2 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 3,600RPM | 2,700RPM | ▲ 620+900 RPM · +33% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 2 | Same |
| Displacement | 49.8ci | 60.6ci | ▲ R2000+10.8 ci · +22% |
| Bore | 3.3in | 3.2in | ▲ 620+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3in | 3.7in | ▲ R2000+0.7 in · +23% |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Mitsubishi R2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Mitsubishi R2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 82.7in | 92.1in | ▲ R2000+9.4 in · +11% |
| Width | 47.6in | 54.5in | ▲ R2000+6.9 in · +14% |
| Height | 42.9in | 52in | ▲ R2000+9.1 in · +21% |
| Operating Weight | 1,499lb | 1,786lb | ▲ R2000+287 lb · +19% |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Mitsubishi R2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | 2,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 2,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Mitsubishi R2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Mitsubishi R2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Mitsubishi R2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Mitsubishi R2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 22nd percentile (19.5 hp)B · 23rd percentile (19.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 9th percentile (49.8 ci)B · 19th percentile (60.6 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 11th percentile (2)B · 11th percentile (2)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 22nd percentile (1,499 lb)B · 32nd percentile (1,786 lb)
Length
median 113 inA · 10th percentile (82.7 in)B · 18th percentile (92.1 in)
A · 620B · R2000Median Sub-Compact Tractor