Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers 620
Utility
- power
- 19.5 hp
- displacement
- 49.8 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Allis Chalmers 620 vs Yanmar FV-200
YanmarModel B
Yanmar FV-200
Utility
- power
- 19.2 hp
- displacement
- 81.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers 620
vs
YanmarYanmar FV-200
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 620 higher · +0.3 hp (+2%)62019.5 hp
FV-20019.2 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
620 is in the 8th percentile; FV-200 is in the 7th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ FV-200 higher · +31.4 ci (+63%)62049.8 ci
FV-20081.2 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
620 is in the 3rd percentile; FV-200 is in the 13th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ FV-200 higher · +1 (+50%)6202
FV-2003
Median Utility Tractor4
620 is in the 3rd percentile; FV-200 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
620 (A)FV-200 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Yanmar FV-200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Yanmar | — |
| Model | 620 | FV-200 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Yanmar FV-200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Onan | Yanmar | — |
| Model | CCKB | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 19.5hp | 19.2hp | ▲ 620+0.3 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 3,600RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ 620+1,000 RPM · +38% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ FV-200+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 49.8ci | 81.2ci | ▲ FV-200+31.4 ci · +63% |
| Bore | 3.3in | 3.2in | ▲ 620+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3in | 3.3in | ▲ FV-200+0.3 in · +10% |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Yanmar FV-200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Yanmar FV-200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 82.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 47.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 42.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 1,499lb | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Yanmar FV-200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | 2,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 2,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Yanmar FV-200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Yanmar FV-200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 620 | Yanmar FV-200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 8th percentile (19.5 hp)B · 7th percentile (19.2 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 3rd percentile (49.8 ci)B · 13th percentile (81.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 23rd percentile (3)
A · 620B · FV-200Median Utility Tractor