Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers 8010
Row Crop
- power
- 119 hp
- displacement
- 301 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Row Crop
Allis Chalmers 8010 vs Ford 276
Image not recorded
FordModel B
Ford 276
Utility
- power
- 116 hp
- displacement
- 268 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers 8010
vs
FordFord 276
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ 8010 higher · +3 hp (+3%)8010119 hp
276116 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
8010 is in the 38th percentile; 276 is in the 36th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 8010 higher · +33 ci (+12%)8010301 ci
276268 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
8010 is in the 32nd percentile; 276 is in the 20th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ 8010 higher · +2 (+50%)80106
2764
Median Row Crop Tractor6
8010 is in the 50th percentile; 276 is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ 276 higher · +870 lb (+7%)801012,630 lb
27613,500 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
8010 is in the 52nd percentile; 276 is in the 59th · 1,350 models
8010 (A)276 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 8010 | Ford 276 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Ford | — |
| Model | 8010 | 276 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 8010 | Ford 276 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Ford | — |
| Model | 649T | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 119hp | 116hp | ▲ 8010+3 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ 276+200 RPM · +9% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 8010+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 301ci | 268ci | ▲ 8010+33 ci · +12% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 4.4in | ▲ 276+0.5 in · +13% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 4.4in | ▲ 276+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 8010 | Ford 276 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partial power shift | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 8010 | Ford 276 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 187in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 92.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 114in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 12,630lb | 13,500lb | ▲ 276+870 lb · +7% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 8010 | Ford 276 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Load-sensitive | Closed center load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Articulated power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 8010 | Ford 276 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 8010 | Ford 276 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 6,680lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 8010 | Ford 276 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Articulated power | — |
| Brake Type | Differential hydraulic wet discs | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 8010 | Ford 276 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 8010 | Ford 276 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 6.5gal | 5.8gal | ▲ 8010+0.7 gal · +12% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 8010 | Ford 276 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 38th percentile (119 hp)B · 36th percentile (116 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 32nd percentile (301 ci)B · 20th percentile (268 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 17th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 52nd percentile (12,630 lb)B · 59th percentile (13,500 lb)
A · 8010B · 276Median Row Crop Tractor