Head to head · Row Crop

Allis Chalmers 8010 vs Ford 9030

Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersModel A

Allis Chalmers 8010

Row Crop

power
119 hp
displacement
301 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full 8010 specs
Ford 9030 Tractor
FordModel B

Ford 9030

Utility

power
116 hp
displacement
268 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full 9030 specs
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers 8010
vs
FordFord 9030

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 806–1,417

Engine Power

▲ 8010 higher · +3 hp (+3%)
8010119 hp
9030116 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

8010 is in the 38th percentile; 9030 is in the 36th · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 8010 higher · +33 ci (+12%)
8010301 ci
9030268 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

8010 is in the 32nd percentile; 9030 is in the 20th · 1,409 models

Cylinders

▲ 8010 higher · +2 (+50%)
80106
90304
Median Row Crop Tractor6

8010 is in the 50th percentile; 9030 is in the 17th · 1,417 models

Operating Weight

▲ 8010 higher · +2,480 lb (+24%)
801012,630 lb
903010,150 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb

8010 is in the 52nd percentile; 9030 is in the 32nd · 1,350 models

8010 (A)9030 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecAllis Chalmers 8010Ford 9030Difference
ManufacturerAllis ChalmersFord—
Model80109030—
CategoryRow CropUtility—

Engine

SpecAllis Chalmers 8010Ford 9030Difference
ManufacturerAllis ChalmersFord—
Model649TBSD444T—
Power Output119hp116hp▲ 8010+3 hp · +3%
Rated RPM2,300RPM2,500RPM▲ 9030+200 RPM · +9%
Cylinders64▲ 8010+2 · +50%
Displacement301ci268ci▲ 8010+33 ci · +12%
Bore3.9in4.4in▲ 9030+0.5 in · +13%
Stroke4.3in4.4in▲ 9030+0.1 in · +2%

Transmission

SpecAllis Chalmers 8010Ford 9030Difference
TypePartial power shiftHydrostatic—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecAllis Chalmers 8010Ford 9030Difference
Length187in180in▲ 8010+7 in · +4%
Width92.6in81.3in▲ 8010+11.3 in · +14%
Height114in117in▲ 9030+3 in · +3%
Operating Weight12,630lb10,150lb▲ 8010+2,480 lb · +24%

Hydraulics

SpecAllis Chalmers 8010Ford 9030Difference
System TypeLoad-sensitiveClosed-center load-sensing—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerArticulated Power—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecAllis Chalmers 8010Ford 9030Difference
TypeIndependentNot recorded—
Speed 1540rpmNot recorded—
Speed 21,000rpmNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecAllis Chalmers 8010Ford 9030Difference
Hitch TypeThree-Point HitchThree-Point HitchSame
Hitch CategoryIIII/I—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch Capacity6,680lbNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecAllis Chalmers 8010Ford 9030Difference
Chassis Type4x2 2WD4x4 articulated 4WD—
Drive Type2WD4WD—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerArticulated Power—
Brake TypeDifferential hydraulic wet discsNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecAllis Chalmers 8010Ford 9030Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecAllis Chalmers 8010Ford 9030Difference
Coolant6.5gal6.4gal▲ 8010+0.1 gal · +2%

Operator Station

SpecAllis Chalmers 8010Ford 9030Difference
TypeCabCabSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 38th percentile (119 hp)B · 36th percentile (116 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 32nd percentile (301 ci)B · 20th percentile (268 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 17th percentile (4)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 52nd percentile (12,630 lb)B · 32nd percentile (10,150 lb)

Length

median 180 in
A · 58th percentile (187 in)B · 50th percentile (180 in)
A · 8010B · 9030Median Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageAllis Chalmers 8010Full spec pageFord 9030