Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers 8010
Row Crop
- power
- 119 hp
- displacement
- 301 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Row Crop
Allis Chalmers 8010 vs Ursus 1224
Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers 8010
vs
UrsusUrsus 1224
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
= Effectively tied8010119 hp
1224119 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
8010 is in the 38th percentile; 1224 is in the 38th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1224 higher · +115 ci (+38%)8010301 ci
1224416 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
8010 is in the 32nd percentile; 1224 is in the 70th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied80106
12246
Median Row Crop Tractor6
8010 is in the 50th percentile; 1224 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied801016
122416
Median Row Crop Tractor16
8010 is in the 50th percentile; 1224 is in the 50th · 1,200 models
8010 (A)1224 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 8010 | Ursus 1224 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Ursus | — |
| Model | 8010 | 1224 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 8010 | Ursus 1224 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Zetor | — |
| Model | 649T | Z 8701.1 | — |
| Power Output | 119hp | 119hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 8010+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 301ci | 416ci | ▲ 1224+115 ci · +38% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 4.3in | ▲ 1224+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 4.7in | ▲ 1224+0.4 in · +9% |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 8010 | Ursus 1224 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partial power shift | Mechanical, synchromesh with reductor | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 8010 | Ursus 1224 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 187in | 181in | ▲ 8010+6 in · +3% |
| Width | 92.6in | 89.4in | ▲ 8010+3.2 in · +4% |
| Height | 114in | 103in | ▲ 8010+11 in · +11% |
| Operating Weight | 12,630lb | 10,737lb | ▲ 8010+1,893 lb · +18% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 8010 | Ursus 1224 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Load-sensitive | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 8010 | Ursus 1224 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 8010 | Ursus 1224 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | 3-point hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | II | 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 6,680lb | 12,126lb | ▲ 1224+5,446 lb · +82% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 8010 | Ursus 1224 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Differential hydraulic wet discs | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 8010 | Ursus 1224 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 8010 | Ursus 1224 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 6.5gal | 6.9gal | ▲ 1224+0.4 gal · +6% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 8010 | Ursus 1224 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 38th percentile (119 hp)B · 38th percentile (119 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 32nd percentile (301 ci)B · 70th percentile (416 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 52nd percentile (12,630 lb)B · 37th percentile (10,737 lb)
A · 8010B · 1224Median Row Crop Tractor