Head to head · Row Crop

Allis Chalmers 8050 vs Ford 8670

Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersModel A

Allis Chalmers 8050

Row Crop

power
169 hp
displacement
426 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
20
Full 8050 specs
Image not recorded
FordModel B

Ford 8670

Agricultural

power
170 hp
displacement
456 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full 8670 specs
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers 8050
vs
FordFord 8670

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 279–1,417

Engine Power

▲ 8670 higher · +1 hp (<1%)
8050169 hp
8670170 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

8050 is in the 66th percentile; 8670 is in the 67th · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 8670 higher · +30 ci (+7%)
8050426 ci
8670456 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

8050 is in the 72nd percentile; 8670 is in the 80th · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
80506
86706
Median Row Crop Tractor6

8050 is in the 50th percentile; 8670 is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Forward Gears

▲ 8050 higher · +4 (+25%)
805020
867016
Median Row Crop Tractor16

8050 is in the 70th percentile; 8670 is in the 50th · 1,200 models

8050 (A)8670 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecAllis Chalmers 8050Ford 8670Difference
ManufacturerAllis ChalmersFord—
Model80508670—
CategoryRow CropAgricultural—

Engine

SpecAllis Chalmers 8050Ford 8670Difference
ManufacturerAllis ChalmersFord—
Model670INot recorded—
Power Output169hp170hp▲ 8670+1 hp · <1%
Rated RPM2,300RPM2,100RPM▲ 8050+200 RPM · +10%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement426ci456ci▲ 8670+30 ci · +7%
Bore4.3in4.4in▲ 8670+0.1 in · +2%
Stroke5in5inSame

Transmission

SpecAllis Chalmers 8050Ford 8670Difference
TypePartial power shiftFull Power Shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecAllis Chalmers 8050Ford 8670Difference
Length187in197in▲ 8670+10 in · +5%
Width95.5in96.7in▲ 8670+1.2 in · +1%
Height113in121in▲ 8670+8 in · +7%
Operating Weight15,305lb18,199lb▲ 8670+2,894 lb · +19%

Hydraulics

SpecAllis Chalmers 8050Ford 8670Difference
System TypeClosed-center load-sensitiveClosed Center Load Sensing—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerNot recorded—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecAllis Chalmers 8050Ford 8670Difference
TypeIndependentNot recorded—
Speed 11,000rpmNot recorded—
Speed 2540rpmNot recorded—
Speed 31,000rpmNot recorded—

Tires

SpecAllis Chalmers 8050Ford 8670Difference
Rear Tire SizeNot recorded18.4R42—

Hitch & Towing

SpecAllis Chalmers 8050Ford 8670Difference
Hitch TypeThree-Point HitchThree-Point HitchSame
Hitch CategoryIII/IIIII—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch Capacity6,680lb10,000lb▲ 8670+3,320 lb · +50%

Chassis & Drive

SpecAllis Chalmers 8050Ford 8670Difference
Chassis Type4x2 2WDNot recorded—
Drive Type2WDNot recorded—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerNot recorded—
Brake TypeDifferential hydraulic wet discsNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecAllis Chalmers 8050Ford 8670Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectric Starter—

Capacities

SpecAllis Chalmers 8050Ford 8670Difference
Coolant8gal6.6gal▲ 8050+1.4 gal · +21%

Operator Station

SpecAllis Chalmers 8050Ford 8670Difference
TypeAcousta CabCab—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 66th percentile (169 hp)B · 67th percentile (170 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 72nd percentile (426 ci)B · 80th percentile (456 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 70th percentile (20)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 68th percentile (15,305 lb)B · 79th percentile (18,199 lb)
A · 8050B · 8670Median Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageAllis Chalmers 8050Full spec pageFord 8670