Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers 8550
Utility
- power
- 300 hp
- displacement
- 731 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 20
Head to head · Utility
Allis Chalmers 8550 vs Fendt 933
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt 933
Agricultural
- power
- 288 hp
- displacement
- 551 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers 8550
vs
FendtFendt 933
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 8550 higher · +12 hp (+4%)8550300 hp
933288 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
8550 is in the 97th percentile; 933 is in the 96th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 8550 higher · +180 ci (+33%)8550731 ci
933551 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
8550 is in the 96th percentile; 933 is in the 94th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied85506
9336
Median Utility Tractor4
8550 is in the 93rd percentile; 933 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 933 higher · +1,170 lb (+4%)855027,040 lb
93328,210 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
8550 is in the 96th percentile; 933 is in the 97th · 5,107 models
8550 (A)933 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 8550 | Fendt 933 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Fendt | — |
| Model | 8550 | 933 | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 8550 | Fendt 933 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | AGCO GmbH Johann Georg Fendt | — |
| Model | 6120T | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 300hp | 288hp | ▲ 8550+12 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 1,700RPM | ▲ 8550+800 RPM · +47% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 731ci | 551ci | ▲ 8550+180 ci · +33% |
| Bore | 5.3in | 4.5in | ▲ 8550+0.8 in · +18% |
| Stroke | 6.3in | 5.7in | ▲ 8550+0.6 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 8550 | Fendt 933 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partial Power Shift | stepless Vario transmission | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 8550 | Fendt 933 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 285in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 95.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 139in | 130in | ▲ 8550+9 in · +7% |
| Operating Weight | 27,040lb | 28,210lb | ▲ 933+1,170 lb · +4% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 8550 | Fendt 933 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 8550 | Fendt 933 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 8550 | Fendt 933 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | IV/III | Category 3 | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 8550 | Fendt 933 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 Articulated 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic Wet Discs | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 8550 | Fendt 933 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 8550 | Fendt 933 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 18gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers 8550 | Fendt 933 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Acousta Cab II with heat and air-conditioning | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 97th percentile (300 hp)B · 96th percentile (288 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 96th percentile (731 ci)B · 94th percentile (551 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 96th percentile (27,040 lb)B · 97th percentile (28,210 lb)
Height
median 94.1 inA · 97th percentile (139 in)B · 96th percentile (130 in)
A · 8550B · 933Median Utility Tractor