Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers D272
Utility
- power
- 27.5 hp
- displacement
- 125 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 3
Head to head · Utility
Allis Chalmers D272 vs McCormick Intl X10.30H
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X10.30H
Sub-Compact
- power
- 28 hp
- displacement
- 85 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers D272
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X10.30H
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ X10.30H higher · +0.5 hp (+2%)D27227.5 hp
X10.30H28 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
D272 is in the 19th percentile; X10.30H is in the 20th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ D272 higher · +40 ci (+47%)D272125 ci
X10.30H85 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
D272 is in the 30th percentile; X10.30H is in the 14th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ D272 higher · +1 (+33%)D2724
X10.30H3
Median Utility Tractor4
D272 is in the 50th percentile; X10.30H is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ X10.30H higher · +1,057 lb (+51%)D2722,060 lb
X10.30H3,117 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
D272 is in the 13th percentile; X10.30H is in the 24th · 5,107 models
D272 (A)X10.30H (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D272 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | D272 | X10.30H | — |
| Category | Utility | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D272 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis-Chalmers | Daedong | — |
| Model | 2.1L 4-cyl gasoline | 3A139 | — |
| Power Output | 27.5hp | 28hp | ▲ X10.30H+0.5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 1,650RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ X10.30H+950 RPM · +58% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ D272+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 125ci | 85ci | ▲ D272+40 ci · +47% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.2in | ▲ D272+0.3 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 3.5in | 3.6in | ▲ X10.30H+0.1 in · +3% |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D272 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D272 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 110in | 122in | ▲ X10.30H+12 in · +11% |
| Width | Not recorded | 54.6in | — |
| Height | 63in | 96.8in | ▲ X10.30H+33.8 in · +54% |
| Operating Weight | 2,060lb | 3,117lb | ▲ X10.30H+1,057 lb · +51% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D272 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Gear pump | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D272 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Rear Type I | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D272 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D272 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D272 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 2gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers D272 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 19th percentile (27.5 hp)B · 20th percentile (28 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 30th percentile (125 ci)B · 14th percentile (85 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 13th percentile (2,060 lb)B · 24th percentile (3,117 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 16th percentile (110 in)B · 31st percentile (122 in)
A · D272B · X10.30HMedian Utility Tractor